Podcasts | 24x7 | Leading Resource for Healthcare Technology Management Professionals https://24x7mag.com/resource-center/podcasts/ 24x7 Magazine offers in-depth coverage and the latest news in Healthcare Technology Management, serving as the premier resource for HTM professionals seeking industry insights and updates. Tue, 17 Dec 2024 22:11:24 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.1 https://24x7mag.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/cropped-24x7-Logo-fav-1-32x32.png Podcasts | 24x7 | Leading Resource for Healthcare Technology Management Professionals https://24x7mag.com/resource-center/podcasts/ 32 32 Attracting New Talent to the HTM Field Through Apprenticeship https://24x7mag.com/resource-center/podcasts/attracting-new-talent-to-the-htm-field-through-apprenticeship/ Thu, 14 Nov 2024 20:46:59 +0000 https://24x7mag.com/?p=388185

Summary: In this HTM 24×7 episode, Maggie Berkey, CBET, discusses the BMET apprenticeship program, the need for increased awareness of HTM, and strategies for proactive service management. Berkey highlights the importance of communicating HTM’s value to executives and addressing workforce shortages through outreach and education.

Key Takeaways:

  • BMET Apprenticeship – A structured, flexible program to address the workforce gap.
  • Proactive Awareness – Outreach and executive communication are essential for HTM’s growth and visibility.

In this episode of HTM 24×7, host Keri Stephens sits down with Maggie Berkey, a senior biomedical equipment technician (BMET) and certified biomedical equipment technician (CBET) at Bio-Electronics, to discuss the evolving landscape of healthcare technology management (HTM).

With over 15 years in the field, Berkey has witnessed and contributed to major changes, particularly in workforce development and awareness of the HTM profession. From national apprenticeship programs to proactive service management strategies, Berkey’s insights reveal both the challenges and opportunities ahead for HTM professionals.

The BMET Apprenticeship Program: Building the Next Generation of HTM Professionals

One of the central topics discussed was the BMET apprenticeship program, which Berkey helped pioneer. Registered nationally with the Department of Labor, the apprenticeship offers a structured path for training future BMETs, filling a critical need as many experienced professionals approach retirement. Before the program’s registration, Berkey and her team rigorously vetted it with over 100 professionals across various HTM roles to ensure it met industry standards.

RELATED: Growing a Career: Cultivating Your Own Biomed Tech Talent

Berkey emphasizes the flexibility of the program, noting that its competencies are publicly accessible on the AAMI website, allowing organizations to tailor training based on specific needs. Large independent service organizations (ISOs) have embraced the apprenticeship, with many adapting it to fit their unique operational demands. AAMI also supports organizations with resources like grant opportunities, making the program accessible to veterans and others who wish to enter the field. Graduates of the apprenticeship are guaranteed to become well-trained, entry-level BMETs, equipped to support HTM departments in a variety of settings.

Boosting Awareness: The “Best Kept Secret” of the Healthcare Sector

Berkey and Stephens discuss a persistent issue in HTM: lack of public awareness. Despite the crucial role HTM professionals play in maintaining healthcare technology, many people—including potential future technicians—remain unaware of the field. Berkey advocates for a dedicated media campaign to bring HTM into the spotlight, suggesting short commercials or even leveraging social media platforms like TikTok to attract younger generations.

Community outreach is another strategy Berkey endorses. Speaking engagements at schools, career fairs, and community events can pique interest in the field among young people, career switchers, and military veterans. By wearing branded HTM apparel and encouraging conversations, HTM professionals can help demystify their work and inspire those interested in technical, hands-on roles within healthcare.

Best Practices for Engaging C-Suite Executives

Another critical area for HTM professionals, Berkey advises, is the need to communicate effectively with C-suite executives to secure necessary resources and support. HTM teams must be prepared to articulate their value to the organization, using metrics that demonstrate cost savings and the importance of HTM in reducing equipment-related risks.

Berkey stresses the importance of creating a concise “elevator pitch” that summarizes HTM’s contributions, from equipment lifecycle management to regulatory compliance. She encourages professionals to focus on the proactive aspects of HTM, such as preventive maintenance and cost avoidance, which contribute to both safety and financial health within healthcare facilities.

From Reactive to Proactive: Improving Efficiency in HTM

A recurring theme in Berkey’s discussion is the shift from reactive to proactive service management. In a time when HTM departments face increasing demands with limited resources, Berkey suggests strategies such as conducting routine rounds with clinical staff and bringing tools to the field to streamline repairs.

Another initiative Berkey highlights is the application of Six Sigma principles to reduce redundant tasks and improve workflow. For instance, she points out that some equipment, like otoscopes and hospital beds, undergo routine checks by clinical staff that HTM teams can rely on, rather than duplicating efforts.

Addressing the Future: Challenges and Opportunities

As the episode concludes, Berkey reflects on her outlook for the future of HTM. She expresses both optimism and concern, noting that while technological advancements provide significant opportunities, they also present challenges. With the growing integration of HTM with IT and materials management, professionals need to ensure they’re focusing on value-added activities rather than “stupid work” that simply checks boxes without meaningful impact.

Berkey urges HTM teams to prioritize tasks that enhance the organization’s safety and efficiency, pushing for smarter resource allocation and cross-departmental collaborations. With many experienced professionals set to retire, developing a proactive, strategic approach is essential for the future of HTM.

Podcast Transcript

Keri Stephens (00:10)
Hi, welcome to the HTM 24×7 podcast. I’m your host, Keri Stephens. For this episode, I’m joined by someone I’ve wanted to talk to for years, Maggie Berkey, a senior BMET at Bioelectronics and a certified biomedical equipment technician or CBET. Maggie, thanks for joining me today.

Maggie Berkey (00:29)
Thank you for having me, Keri.

Keri Stephens (00:31)
Of course. So just to start, can you tell a listener a little bit about yourself and your background?

Maggie Berkey (00:39)
Well, I’ve been in the field about 15 years now. I’ve held various roles and just kind of

been in awe of how neat this profession is and surprised by the fact that people still just don’t even know it exists.

Keri Stephens (00:59)
Definitely, definitely. Well, I would say that you’re someone that’s really trying to make sure that people do know that it exists and you helped create the BMET apprenticeship. And I really want to delve into that because I think that’s so interesting. So how has the BMET apprenticeship evolved since its national registration?

Maggie Berkey (01:22)
Well, I would say that before we even got it fully approved through the Department of Labor, we vetted it by over 100 people in various roles in the HTM profession to make sure we got it right. And it’s been adopted, I would say, hand over fist in the field. There are several large ISOs that are

currently using the apprenticeship approach. There’s been a lot of modified versions that people kind of built to fit their organizational needs which is a really cool piece of that apprenticeship that those competencies are available for anybody anytime on the AAMI website so take what you like add to it what you need take

and remove whatever doesn’t apply to your organization. And I want to make sure our listeners know that there are still several interest candidates that are on an AAMI waiting list just looking to get started in our profession.

Keri Stephens (02:35)
No, great. Can you tell people just for those who don’t know kind of how the apprenticeship program works?

Maggie Berkey (02:41)
Absolutely. the first step is really reaching out to AAMI, more namely Danielle McGeary and she will kind of vet your organization to make sure that you have the means and should be in this realm. And so you find a candidate in your area that works and

you hire them at your organization and then you work closely with AAMI they can help you identify some funding availability some grants and other monies that are there especially for our VA folks or our vets sorry and just kind of go through that program there’s a level system so after you’ve gotten to a certain

competence level, then you’re going to get a raise, at least one raise throughout the apprenticeship. And by the time you’re done with your training and have checked off all your competencies, you’re going to be a really strong BMET one.

Keri Stephens (03:55)
know that it’s an amazing program and some what I’ve really, you know, at 24 seven tried to highlight because I think it’s so important, especially, obviously, you know, we know from the salary survey, how important it is to get more fresh blood in the field as people retire. So I think it’s an incredible way to just attract attention and, you know, to retain some good talent too, because they’re apprentices. so the reason I wanted to have you on is I worked with you, gosh, it’ll be a

year and a half ago, probably, because it was AAMI 2023. But you hosted a Fuel to Thrive session at AAMI. And I was lucky enough to partake in it. And I thought it was a great session. And I mean I kind of want to just go back to that. And what were some of most innovative ideas discussed for preparing for the future of HTM? And can you just talk about this session as a whole?

Maggie Berkey (04:51)
Absolutely. And I will correct you and say that was actually in 2022. So time does fly, just like they say. And actually, after we did the AAMI session, there were two more sessions, one in Nebraska at my local biomed association, the HBA, and then we did one out in California at the

Keri Stephens (05:01)
wow, you’re right. Yeah. 2022. Wow. You’re right.

Maggie Berkey (05:21)
Tech Nation event. And we took all the data from those three sessions and compiled them, collated them, and really had some interesting key takeaways that really focused on the candidate shortage that we’ve been experiencing for a while now, lack of standardization,

cross functionality with other departments in the hospital, what corporate responsibility, and then just some miscellaneous that didn’t really fit in any of those boxes. And some things that we really heard loud and clear was that we need a media campaign to just make people aware of the BMET profession.

you know, a 22nd commercial of some sort, you know, get us trending on TikTok or something to really just kind of blast us out there and get that visibility we’ve been looking for. Looking at hybrid roles and how, you know, today we look more like IT than we did 20 years ago. We looked a lot more like maintenance. And now we even

teeter into some materials management things. we also looked at community involvement and how just being in the community, doing speaking engagements, showing people, kind of showing off our work, how we get to almost play day to day. Things like that will help us be able to

really put that re-engineer HTM.

Keri Stephens (07:25)
So part of that too is attracting people to young age. And so what strategies do you suggest for attracting middle school students, military professionals, and career transition transitioners to fill the HTM employment gap?

Maggie Berkey (07:41)
Well, I would say the one thing I do on a very regular basis is use my voice, my passionate voice. And I think if each of us was just to ask a friend that’s not in the field to talk to somebody that they know that doesn’t know about biomed, when we get out in the community and just wear our swag from these events, you know, my bright green AAMI hat, my USOC t-shirt.

makes people ask questions and get some curious, get some thinking. We can make an impression, a big impression if we go to career fairs and our kids’ middle school and grade school and give a presentation, loop each team in a box in the background, make sure that when we’re talking to audiences, even if they’re not the interested participants,

ask them if they know somebody who likes to tinker, who’s a problem solver, who thrives on adventure and has good customer service skills, can they send them our way?

Keri Stephens (08:47)
Thank

No, I think those are all great. And I think it’s wonderful what AAMI’s doing to increase the visibility of the field for people, because that’s something I hear all the time, especially in my role as an editor. Like, what is this industry? I’ve never heard of it. And I think the visibility problem seems to be one of the main ones. So this is amazing.

Maggie Berkey (09:07)
Thank

We are the best kept secret, that is for sure.

Keri Stephens (09:16)
I agree, I definitely agree. okay, so kind of switching gears, about the best kept secret, what are some best practices you recommend for HTM professionals when communicating with the C-suite executives to gain support and resources?

Maggie Berkey (09:35)
Well, if you don’t already have your elevator speech put together, make sure you’ve got something where you can kind of talk to and if you should be, if you aren’t tracking the money that you not only save, but you avoid spending because you’re able to kind of bridge some of those costs and they just need to be aware of the value that you and your team add. We do cradle.

to grave equipment management in HTM. It’s not just PMs, it’s repairs, it’s projects. We sit in on meetings like capital and environment of care. We remediate recalls. We can do contract management. So they just need to be aware of and know that we’re in the trenches every day to make them look better. We’re focused on safety. We’re focused on quality.

that adds value to the organization.

Keri Stephens (10:37)
No, I completely agree. everyone’s trying to do more with less right now. And how can HTM professionals, departments make better use of limited resources? As discussed in one of the sessions at HTM Fuel to Thrive, one of the sessions on technician efficiency. So again, how can HTM professionals and departments make better use of limited resources?

Maggie Berkey (11:02)
That’s a great question. I would say we’ve got to be a little more strategic. So I think rounds with our customers is invaluable. It just builds that rapport and makes us so when they do accidentally drop something or if they are having an issue, they’re going to call us right away versus putting it in the cabinet and then we have to deal with it on a more reactive basis.

So some things that I’ve personally done is when it’s infusion pump month, I set up my shop on the floor so I’m not spending time running back and forth, back and forth. If that’s not something you can do, another option is to grab your pumps, walk them, you know, as you’re doing your rounds, drop them off, pick up the other pumps and bring them back to the shop.

So at least your time is being spent more wisely. Really, the AEM has been something that we’ve been talking about for over 10 years, but we’re still very much in the infancy of building strong AEM programs. In a lot of cases, that low-hanging fruit, we’re still touching thermometers and otoscopes and…

know, clinic tables when it doesn’t necessarily make sense. It’s not adding value. We also can be looking at some of those gray areas and deciding is that something that should be negotiated for our IT partners or maintenance friends to maybe take on that work.

Keri Stephens (12:40)
Yeah.

Well, I think it was interesting what you just said about the AEM So to you, how important is it for H-Team professionals to shift from a reactive service management to a more proactive approach? And how can this transition be made, in your opinion?

Maggie Berkey (13:12)
It’s critical. I think anybody who’s been in the field in the last five years know we’re trying to do so much more with so much less. We’ve got this retirement exodus. We’ve got the ongoing issue with name recognition. We have to be proactive, period. We can start today. We need to start partnering up with

our frontline clinical staff and do some of the education for anything that appears in the user manual that tells you that the users are expected to and capable of doing that work. I was reading an article about some Six Sigma, Mark Cuxley talked about, you know, the PM on a VersaCare bed.

It’s the function checks that are being done in the PM are being done by frontline staff every single day. So an otoscope basically you function check it every single time you use it and if you can just educate your staff to be looking for you know some kind of damage to the case then you’ve checked that box too. Don’t do that work anymore if somebody else is already doing it. Have your

partners in security maybe do your AED checks. They’re walking around the facility anyway and they can look for a green check mark just like you can. I’ve seen places use, you know, different staff to go around and bring the broken equipment back to the shop. My CMMS ticketing system allows me to kind of know what I’m going into.

So I can either email the person who created the ticket to say, materials can get you a replacement probe, or I can bring my power cord and my safety analyzer with me when I’m going to take that first look. Things like that are just huge. if you’re sketching out a 10-year capital plan, making sure that materials has the proper accessories

on their shelf and that there’s some backups for the weekend, then you’re going to save a ton of time and money on on call.

Keri Stephens (15:45)
Yeah. No, that’s great. As a final question, because you’ve been so, you just have so much knowledge of this. What scares you most about the field right now? What excites you most as, know, we’re kind of wrapping up 2024 looking ahead. What are your thoughts? Okay.

Maggie Berkey (16:02)
one answer. A, I would say it does both for me. I can definitely see some of the huge wins we can get day one. I also can see some of the scenarios that, you know, if we’re not ahead of it, and if we’re not, we don’t have a plan to manage it, we might get out of hand a little

Keri Stephens (16:06)
Right. OK.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Maggie Berkey (16:31)
faster than I would think we should. So I would say we’ve got all this technology and it can really be helpful. We’ve got to be working on value added activities and stop doing what I call stupid work. That doesn’t really help anybody. It’s just checking a box because that’s a box that we’ve always been expected to check.

Keri Stephens (17:01)
No, that’s really good. I have the same concern, so I see that. Well, thank you so much, Maggie. I know our listeners will be really excited to hear what you have to say. And to our listeners, thank you as always for your listenership. And be sure to check out www.24x7mag.com for the latest industry insights and news. Take care. Thank you.

Maggie Berkey (17:25)
Thank you. You take care.

]]>
AAMI President Pamela Arora on Advancing HTM Standards https://24x7mag.com/resource-center/podcasts/aami-president-pamela-arora-on-advancing-htm-standards/ Fri, 16 Aug 2024 20:23:47 +0000 https://24x7mag.com/?p=387452

Summary: AAMI’s CEO, Pamela Arora, highlighted the organization’s focus on advancing health technology through standards like EQ103, supporting diversity in HTM via the Women in Leadership project, and addressing challenges posed by emerging technologies.

Key Takeaways:

    • EQ103 Standard: AAMI introduced the EQ103 standard to provide HTM professionals with a flexible, risk-based framework for managing medical equipment maintenance, ensuring safety and effectiveness while allowing deviations from OEM guidelines.
    • Women in Leadership (WIL) Initiative: AAMI actively supports the Women in Leadership project, aiming to address the gender gap in the HTM field by providing mentorship, resources, and networking opportunities to empower women and encourage their advancement in the industry.
    • Focus on Emerging Technologies: AAMI is expanding its initiatives in digital health and cybersecurity, alongside developing new standards for the safe implementation of AI and machine learning in medical devices, addressing the increasing complexity of healthcare technology.

In a recent episode of the HTM 24×7 podcast, host Keri Stephens interviewed Pamela Arora, President and CEO of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI), who has been leading the organization since 2022. Arora emphasized AAMI’s continued role as a neutral leader in advancing health technology, particularly through its standards development processes.

She highlighted that AAMI, with over 55 years of history, remains focused on fostering innovation, safety, and addressing the evolving needs of the industry, particularly within the healthcare technology management (HTM) community.

EQ103: A New Standard in Equipment Management

A significant portion of the discussion centered around the upcoming EQ103 standard on alternative equipment management (AEM). Arora explained that this new standard is designed to provide HTM professionals with a structured yet flexible framework for managing medical equipment in a way that may differ from OEM recommendations but still ensures safety and effectiveness. The rapid development of EQ103, completed in under a year, showcases AAMI’s commitment to addressing urgent needs in healthcare.

Empowering Women in HTM

Arora also discussed AAMI’s involvement in the Women in Leadership (WIL) project, which aims to bridge the gender gap in the male-dominated HTM field. With less than 10% of the HTM workforce being female, AAMI is actively supporting initiatives that mentor and empower women, thereby promoting diversity and inclusion in the industry.

Future Initiatives and Challenges

Looking ahead, Arora expressed excitement about AAMI’s upcoming projects, including expanding digital health and cybersecurity programs, and developing standards for emerging technologies like AI and machine learning in medical devices. She acknowledged the challenges posed by the rapid pace of technological advancement but reaffirmed AAMI’s commitment to supporting HTM professionals through these changes.

Overall, Arora’s insights provide a comprehensive look at AAMI’s ongoing efforts to advance the HTM field while maintaining its role as a neutral and trusted leader in health technology standards.

Podcast Transcript

Keri Stephens
hi, welcome to the HTM 24×7 podcast. I’m your host, Keri Stephens. For this episode, I’m joined by someone I’ve wanted to talk to for years, AAMI’s president and CEO Pamela Arora, who took over in 2022. Pamela, thank you for joining me today.

Pamela Arora 
Thank you, Keri I really appreciate the opportunity to visit with you and your listeners. And I am honored to be here. We love 24×7

Keri Stephens
Well, we love AAMI And again, you are someone that I really wanted to talk to for a while. And, you know, just to dive in, let’s talk about your role. So you have been in your role for about two and a half years. So what has been your primary focus since taking over as AAMI’s President and CEO in 2022?

Pamela Arora 
Good question. Since stepping into this role, my primary focus has been ensuring that AAMI continues, and I use that word really with respect, continues to serve as a critical leader in advancing health technology. AAMI has been around for over 55 years, so we don’t want to break what has been just a great recipe over the years.

AAMI is uniquely positioned as a neutral convener of all the major stakeholder groups involved with medical devices and sterilization. That includes manufacturers, sterilization services, regulators, and healthcare delivery organizations. AAMI’s work related to HTM is driven by our Vice President of HTM, Danielle McGeary who is heavily involved with our strategic initiatives that support the HTM community.

and promotes the safety, innovation solutions, and evolving needs of the industry. I know that Danielle has been on your podcast several times, and we just love your 24×7.

Keri Stephens 
Well, and we love AAMI and Danielle. mean, she’s amazing. I respect her so much and you too. And no, we love AAMI here.

Pamela Arora
Yeah, I do want to clarify some things though, because in the HTM community in particular, they’re not as familiar with what is AAMI’s core, which is being a standards development organization. And that really actually puts us in a great position to advance the HTM profession by leveraging these standards processes. In my role, what I’ve been doing is putting an emphasis on these processes relative to HTM.

And standards are consensus -based. Some of the, I would say some of AAMI stakeholders are really versed and that’s why they come to AAMI. In the case of HTM, it varies quite a bit, but our standards are consensus -based and followed a structured development process using ANSI, the American National Standards Institute. Now there are also international standard processes, but in the HTM space, we’re primarily using the ANSI processes.

And that works in collaboration, not only within the HTM community, which is like BMETs clinical engineers, healthcare providers, but it’s broader than that. It’s third -party servicers, manufacturers, regulators, really, really partner well with the FDA Joint Commission. This actually ensures that AAMI standards are comprehensive, relevant, and reflect the latest technology and clinical advancements.

This structured approach is rigorous. It includes public commenting, revisions, balloting. And because of all of that aspect, it creates a well -rounded and widely accepted standard. And for the most part, we’ve been driving that process within the HTM community by enhancing the quality, safety, education, and innovation. But that one I want to call out because I think the HTM professionals

They know a lot about our education and our certifications, but these standards actually help them manage the complexities of modern healthcare technology, so we really want them to be aware of it.

Keri Stephens 
No, I’m glad you’re mentioning the standards because there’s one that I really want to talk about in this podcast. So EQ103, which is a standard on alternative equipment management. Can you talk about that and what inspired its development and what are its key features?

Pamela Arora
Yeah, great question. And I’m glad you asked because it’s so relevant to our HTM professionals and clinical engineers. EQ 103, it’s a forthcoming standard about alternative equipment. And I would say the HTM folks really know AEMs well. And really working through that, the development of EQ 103 was inspired by the need to create a more flexible

and practical element for managing equipment and healthcare studies, but do it in a standardized manner. So the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services, CMS, they permit HTM professionals to use their expertise and equip history data to develop maintenance strategies that may differ from the OEM’s recommendations. Now, our HTM group knows that quite well.

The thing about it is CMS has not been specific on how to safely and effectively deploy this flexibility, and that is crucial in certain situations. At the same time, you have the OEM maintenance procedures, and they may not consider all the possible uses, environmental conditions, or availability of alternative diagnostic or monitoring tools.

AAMI and our stakeholders aim to outline effective implementation approaches that provide flexibility while ensuring safe and effective choices. AEM programs that comply with EQ 103, it will help with the performance and safety of the equipment and make sure that they’re not compromised. And as all of us are patients and our loved ones are patients, we want to make sure that the devices are working appropriately.

from the standpoint of healthcare organizations, if they include the AEM program with EQ 103, it’ll provide that framework for assessing equipment eligibility, emphasizing adaptability, risk -based assessments, and thorough documentation. So there’s been a lot of work that has gone into this standard, but it impacts the front lines within the health delivery organizations.

on a day -to -day basis. So we’re very excited about it.

Keri Stephens
And I think one thing that’s notable is that EQ 103 has been developed and published in less than a year. Can you talk about the speed of that? Because that’s pretty impressive.

Pamela Arora
It is impressive, but I want to emphasize that standards can take years in the making because you’re bringing in all these voices to make sure that the right standard is being created. The rapid development of EQ 103 is notable because basically it’s showing the commitment of AAMI and our stakeholders and their ability to respond to these emerging needs in healthcare. This accelerated timeline, it was made possible through close

collaboration with industry experts, regulatory bodies, all of whom recognize the urgency of establishing this new standard, partly because there’s so much complexity out there with MED devices. So for the AEMs, this is a highly efficient, yet rigorous standard that was comprehensive and practical for immediate implementation. I credit our great stakeholders for the energy that they put

forth to make this happen. don’t, for those that aren’t heavily involved in standards, they may not realize sometimes it could take five years for a standard to come together. And for this to come together in about a year is really, really a testament to the stakeholders in the community.

Keri Stephens 
Right. No, absolutely. And I just have one more question because I know our listeners in healthcare technology management are going to be very interested in this, but how do you see EQ 103 standard influencing current practices and alternative management of existing equipment?

Pamela Arora
No, it’s a great question. And I will say that with the processes, we had comments throughout. And the public comments, there was just a groundswell. Because when you’re affecting day -to -day operations that way, you can expect there’s opinions, right? Well, it is going to significantly influence current practices. And part of it’s because it provides a structured framework that healthcare organizations can adopt to enhance their existing projects.

processes. It’s not like get rid of everything you’re doing. It’s take a look at what you’re doing and here’s how it can be improved to reduce risk. So this risk -based approach allows for more targeted maintenance strategies and this actually improves safety and reduces downtime and better resource allocation. The standard also as it’s promoted across organization

it’s gonna help to bridge the gaps in practices and ensure that all equipment receives appropriate attention. Over time, EQ 103 will become a cornerstone of alternative equipment management, and we believe setting a new benchmark for best practices in the field. And again, we’re all patients, we have loved ones that are patients. I believe that the patients will see the outcomes of this.

Keri Stephens 
No, that’s wonderful. And so I want to switch gears completely now. I want to hear about AAMI’s involvement in the Women in Leadership Project and its significance for the HTM field. I know because we do our salary survey every year, we know that this industry is predominantly male dominated. But to me, as a woman in this industry too, you know, in some capacity, I think it’s amazing. know, having you as a female president of AAMI, having Danielle, I think it’s…

It’s a really big message to the industry, but I want to hear about this project in particular.

Pamela Arora 
Absolutely. And I love this community. is just AAMI’s involvement in the Women in Leadership or WIL that’s their short name, community is a testament to the commitment around diversity, equity, and inclusion within HTM. And AAMI is incredibly grateful to Women in Leadership President and Founder AAMI April Lebo Have you talked with April Lebo as of yet on 24×7?

Keri Stephens
No, but I would love to.

Pamela Arora 
Yeah, I think that would be brilliant. Also, Kim Rowland, Amber Sportsman, Adriana England, and AAMI’s own Danielle McGeary were big leaders in making this all happen. But the president and founder is April Lebo. The community is designed to support and amplify women’s voices within HTM and help address this gender gap that you just brought up, Keri.

By providing mentorship, resources, and network opportunities, it empowers women in HTM and ensures their contributions are recognized and they have the tools to advance their careers. But I have a stat for you that just was eye -opening to me. In 2021, AAMI conducted an HTM demographic survey and found that less than 10 % of the field was female.

Keri Stephens 
that’s on par with ours too, yeah.

Pamela Arora
Yeah, 10%. And when you look at just how many people are moving out of HTM as they conclude their careers, we can’t afford to not have women. We need to really get that number up and encourage that. AAMI is committed to ensuring women in the HTM field have successful career trajectories through connection with Will.

This community is going to be crucial for creating a more inclusive and innovative HTM field. Ultimately, we hope to, this will lead to better health technology management outcomes. I strongly believe that we really need to have new entrants into the field. And AAMI is so honored to support this community. We love them.

Keri Stephens
I think it’s wonderful. Okay, so what are some other upcoming initiatives or projects that AAMI that you’re really excited about?

Pamela Arora
Well, I have a long list, but I’m going to try to run through it quickly. I’m excited about a number of initiatives at AAMI One is the expansion of our digital health and cybersecurity programs. Obviously increasingly critical as healthcare embraces technology at an accelerated pace. Everybody knows it and there’s so many opportunities that come with it. So we need to go there. We can’t slow down that pace.

We’re also working on new standards and guidelines for emerging technologies such as AI and machine learning and medical devices. We want to make sure that when it’s applied, AI and ML, they are implemented safely and effectively. Additionally, I want to call out AAMI’s Vice President of HTM, Danielle McGeary. She’s been an integral part in enhancing our education and certification programs.

that support HTM professionals at all stages of their career. Now I have a bit of a list here too. These courses and certifications, they provide HTM professionals with the skills and knowledge needed to navigate the changing landscape of health technology. And they include AAMI’s BMET Apprentice Program. That’s starting to get more and more momentum where these apprentices are being taken into the field, which we need that given.

some of the folks that are concluding their careers and we need those resources. Two, we’ve launched a new CEO online journal. Now with that, active certified individuals can more easily submit their CEUs for recertification. And while it doesn’t sound that exciting, if you’re trying to submit it and it’s fussy and it’s difficult,

This is one our stakeholders are going to enjoy because they really do focus on certification, which is great and important for the industry. Third, AAMI’s training and expert insight courses. Also a key one. And then fourth, upcoming offerings such as our CBET study course and our HTM live on September 17th on cybersecurity adoption, really important.

But there’s an overarching fundamental initiative that I’d like to share. It’s AAMI is ensuring the HTM community understands AAMI’s role in health technology space. Our role as a standards development organization, it actually affects what we can and cannot do. We’ve seen some confusion in the course of the time that I’ve been here at AAMI. And in order to develop consensus based standards,

AAMI needs participation from all stakeholders involved in the medical device life cycle. That includes OEMs, HTM professionals, third party services, regulatory agencies, clinicians, healthcare employees. The list keeps getting long. Because of this, AAMI cannot advocate for law or legislation. That’s the part that gets confusing because we’ve had some of our stakeholders,

really upset because we’re not advocating for one position versus another. And that’s really our strength, but also what we offer to the community because that actually helps these great standards come forth. Our neutrality, neutrality allows us to maintain credibility and effectiveness as an SDO, a standards development organization, making sure all voices are heard. But ultimately that actually does

help with safety and efficacy rather than political or even commercial interests. So we’ve been spending a lot of energy to make sure that that’s clarified, especially with our HTM audiences, because in some cases, they’d like us to advocate in a particular direction. And it’s not uncommon in associations where they have a public policy group, right? In our case, our neutrality is our strength.

Keri Stephens
No, that’s really helpful because especially I know the right to repair is so contentious. I’ve noticed that AAMI has taken the neutral stance, which honestly, as a journalist, I’ve had to do the same thing. So I can respect that completely. okay, so for my last question, and I think you’ve covered this a lot, are there any, like, what are the biggest challenges and opportunities currently facing the HTM field and how is AAMI addressing them? If you haven’t already covered that.

Pamela Arora
Yes it is.

Really, HTM has significant changes. And with change, that does create challenge in the field. But really, those changes, I believe, will benefit both patients and HTM professionals. I’ll give you some examples. Accelerated pace of technology investment. That’s going to make it harder to maintain that equipment. But really, it really is a powerful way to have better tools for care delivery.

The complexity of medical devices comes with that interoperability and cybersecurity concerns as things are more networked and the data flows across the continuum of care. Safe implementation of AI and ML, we already talked about that. But from the standpoint of all of these types of things, even take different care settings. So now you’re going to have home health, but you’re going to have acute care health in the home setting.

That really rocks the world of what maintenance looks like in an HTM world. So you look at this and it presents exciting opportunities for growth and innovation. And we’re looking at these challenges, looking for robust standards, best practices to help HTM professionals with these changes and really work those partnerships and collaborations that I mentioned earlier and

bring together these diverse perspectives, expertise to tackle these issues head on. We really believe that HTM can remain resilient and adaptive to these change and as care receivers, as patients, and as their loved ones get care delivery, that’s really the true winner in all of this change that we’re talking about, but it doesn’t simplify the world of the HTM professional.

It’s going to complicate it, but AAMI’s going to be there along their side to help them along the way. We believe in it.

Keri Stephens
Well, thank you so much, Pamela. I know our listeners will be really excited to hear what you have to say. And to our listeners, thank you as always for your listenership. And be sure to check out www .24x7mag .com for the latest industry insights and news. Take care. Thank you.

Pamela Arora
Thanks so much, Keri.

]]>
Getting to Know the 2024 AAMI BMET of the Year https://24x7mag.com/resource-center/podcasts/getting-to-know-the-2024-aami-bmet-of-the-year/ Fri, 02 Aug 2024 21:50:43 +0000 https://24x7mag.com/?p=387357

Summary: Chace Torres, known as the Bearded Biomed, won the AAMI and GE Healthcare’s BMET of the Year award. He discussed his career, podcast, and new children’s book on the HTM 24/7 podcast, emphasizing his dedication to raising awareness about the biomed profession.

Key Takeaways:

  • Torres’s military experience provided a strong foundation for his biomed career.
  • His podcast and children’s book aim to educate and inspire future generations about the biomed field.

Surprise Recognition for Dedicated Work

Keri Stephens, host of the HTM 24/7 podcast, recently welcomed Chace Torres, also known as the Bearded Biomed, to discuss his latest achievement: winning the AAMI and GE Healthcare’s BMET of the Year award. The annual accolade came as a pleasant surprise to Torres who said, “We do the work without the thought of recognition.”

From Army Technician to Industry Advocate

The podcast episode touched on various aspects of Torres’s life and career, highlighting his journey from the US Army to becoming a prominent figure in the biomed field. His military experience laid the foundation for his technical skills and resilience, qualities that have significantly contributed to his success. “Operating under duress and with limited resources is something that can’t really be taught, it’s more of an experience thing,” Torres explained.

Expanding Influence Through Media and Literature

Torres’s contributions to the biomed community extend beyond his technical work. He hosts the Bearded Biomed podcast, which aims to raise awareness about the biomed technician profession. The podcast addresses common questions about the field and serves as a platform to unite both new and seasoned biomeds. Inspired by other podcasters, Torres started his show to fill a gap in public knowledge and to improve his public speaking skills. His efforts have paid off, making a significant impact on the industry.

In addition to his podcast, Torres recently authored a children’s book about the biomed profession. This initiative was driven by his desire to educate young audiences about the field, a move inspired by his impending fatherhood. The book has been well-received, with many biomeds using it to explain their jobs to their children. Torres expressed hope that this early outreach could inspire future generations to consider careers in the biomed field.

Future Plans and Continued Advocacy

Looking ahead, Torres plans to continue his advocacy and educational efforts. He mentioned upcoming changes to his podcast format based on listener feedback, aiming to deliver higher-quality content. Torres will also be speaking at several industry events, including the AAMI conference in Phoenix and the Omaha symposium.

In closing, Torres emphasized the importance of staying informed and engaged with the industry. He encouraged listeners to subscribe to 24/7 magazine, appreciating the valuable information it provides.

Podcast Transcript

Keri Stephens
Hi, welcome to the HTM 24/7 podcast. I’m your host Keri Stephens. For this episode, I’m joined by a good friend of the podcast Chace Torres, aka the Bearded Biomed. To talk about a really big award he recently won, AAMI and GE Healthcare’s BMET of the Year award. In our July/August print issue, we’ll do a deep dive into the award, but we want to talk to Chace about this award and kind of, you know, see what’s been going on in his life. So thanks, Chace. Thanks for joining me today.

Chace Torres
It’s good to see you, Keri, it’s been too long.

Keri Stephens
It’s been way too long. I know, like at least over a year, and that is not okay. So Well, first of all, congrats on your award. That’s a big deal.

Chace Torres
Thank you. But it surprised me to be honest. Yeah. You know, we do the work without the thought of recognition for the most part. I mean, it’s always nice to be awarded. But, you know, it’s one of those things that only one person gets it a year. So I can think of many people that are probably just as if not more deserving. So it’s an honor to get it?

Keri Stephens
Well I have to say, I’m not surprised you got one. I mean, you’re doing so much for the industry, so much advocacy to me, you seem like a no brainer. So congrats again, though.

Chace Torres
Thank you, it’s, I’m looking forward to being in Phoenix. It’ll be my first time in Phoenix too. So from what I hear, it’s going to be a pretty cool event, there’s going to be doing a lot there. So besides getting an award, there are many other things there. So people have an opportunity to, you know, really get to see the show. And this couple of things that me and AAMI have brewing together.

Keri Stephens
So I would love to hear about that. So we know you, you’ve been on the podcast many times, but I don’t think people really know your backstory that much. We’ve really just talked about big topics. So I want to take a deep dive into you. Because we will have a full length feature on you and the July/August issue. But I want to do this for now and just learn more about you here. So to start, how did your experience in the US Army shape your career in biomed.

Chace Torres
And not only just shaped it, it laid the foundation. The career started in the army, the opportunity to learn the craft of biomed and really get entrenched and troubleshooting and learning different modalities and the documentation importance of it. And just learning how to be a technician. And by the time I had gotten out of the military, I had had all those intrinsic values. And, you know, skill sets built into me that most people probably on the outside in the civilian sector going through biomed more than likely won’t be able to, you know, just pick up on their own, operating under duress, working with limited resources. You know, there’s the, there’s the added stress factor of doing everything, no matter what the job is in the military. That’s just something that can’t really be taught. It’s more of an experience thing. So it has served me quite well, especially nowadays. So

Keri Stephens
Especially nowadays. Yeah, let’s talk about that. Let’s talk about your podcast because personally, I think your podcast has been so influential on reaching the new biomed and, you know, this seasoned biomed and just bringing them together and really giving a platform to an industry that people may not know about. So what led you to start your Bearded Biomed podcast?

Chace Torres
The podcast started with two things, one with the want of people to stop asking me, what is a biomed? Because if they knew about the profession, they probably want to ask that simple question. But as we all allude to, the question exists, because the majority of people within the United States and outside even don’t know what the biomed technician profession is. So there was that aspect of it, and everybody I met across the field feels my pain in that they’ve all had to answer that question several times to even family members. The other aspect of that was I needed something to spark the will to want to put myself out there because when I first started, I was not good at public speaking, I wasn’t comfortable in front of a camera, which is why the podcast started audio only. And that initial spark that drew everything towards me was one, I’ve been a frequent follower of Justin “Better Biomed” for years, you know, I was already aware of what he was doing. I appreciate what he did. And then I saw somebody get into the podcast space, which was surreal, with MMS. And her podcasts really inspired me to think, you know, I like how she’s doing it, but I would do it a different way. And those two things just kind of mixed together and pushed me to do it.

Keri Stephens
That’s awesome. And I, personally, I’ve, I love listening to your podcast myself. So I give you all the credit for that. And another thing you recently got is you wrote a children’s book, let’s talk about that. And just, what, why did you decide to write a children’s book? And can you talk to me more about it?

Chace Torres
The children’s book was because we didn’t have one and to fill the void of what’s not there, and I don’t mind being the first to do something. So that’s, that’s always a legacy thing for me as well. You know, after I found out that I was going to be a father. That just more that was the spark to drive me to do it, the will to want to do it was already there. And, you know, it’s a simple way to outreach to kids to, you know, break it down in a simplistic way of what our day to day is. It’s become very beneficial for my fellow biomed’s out there for them, for their kids, to see what mom and dad do. And, you know, I’ve been sent pictures of them reading them for bedtime, I’ve been sent pictures of actually doing read alongs in a kindergarten to three, you know, class setting of all the kids sitting there and the book being read to him like, it’s, it’s pretty amazing. You know, I hope that it continues to just get larger and larger in scope. But for the initial year, year and a half, it’s been out. It’s done pretty well. And I’m okay with that.

Keri Stephens
Honestly, I mean, the fact that you have used your platform to really just branch into so many new ways, the podcast, the book, I mean, it’s pretty incredible, because I don’t think people, obviously they think it’s the biomed field would think that these would be any avenues that people would really go for. But you’ve done it. So bravo to you.

Chace Torres
Thank you.

Keri Stephens
So I want to get into your thoughts of the field as a whole. As you know, you won this award, and you’re obviously influential in the industry. So what are some things that are keeping you up at night about the industry as a whole?

Chace Torres
Okay, you could have cut it halfway and I would say my son is what’s keeping me up at night. It’s just I think there is noticeable progress, or at least I would hope. So. When it comes to people entering the field a little bit. I’ve had outreach from many people that have either listened to my show, or listen to Brian’s or found better biomed or, you know, resources to AAMI, 25×7 or, you know, all the different resources out there. And they’re like, Yeah, I want to do this. And from what I can tell, too, there also seems to be more of an influx of more demographics. So different races. I keep seeing more and more women get into the field, which is encouraging as well. And, you know, when I talked to Danielle, my last episode, I asked, When do you think you might do another survey? And she said, Well, probably every five to seven years. So we’re coming up on another, another run of their survey. And I’m very encouraged to see what those numbers are going to outline because that will give us a snapshot of everything that has been done in the past five years. Are we making progress? It’s very hard to see the progress. So I guess the things that would keep me up are, is the work that we’re putting in, you know, myself and everyone else and people in industry that are trying to put themselves out there to generate hype. about the field and acknowledgement of it, is what we are doing actually working? I guess that would be the thing, which, you know, I’m encouraged to think that it is just based on personal interactions. But you never know. And that’s, that’s the What If?

Keri Stephens
Especially with you writing a children’s book, I mean, you might not know now the impact because it could be in 20 years, 15 years, you know,

Chace Torres
That was to address the, you know, AAMI is doing a lot of great things. But by the time we’re going out and speaking to high school students speaking to possibly, you know, career changers and all that they’ve pretty much made the decision on what they’re going to do already, you have to reach out to younger audiences. Going to high schools, which I’m actually planning on doing later this month. is fantastic. But if we’re not at least putting the little suggestion that, Hey, there’s this cool job out there that exists when they’re younger than we’re not going to see those changes that we need to see.

Keri Stephens
Right? Yeah, I know, for my son, he’s about to be six, he says he wants to be a fixer when he grows up. So I will definitely read to him your book and show him kind of, you know, another fixer, a medical equipment fixer. So

Chace Torres
I think for your son, too. I would probably, for folks out there that have kids that want to tinker and put stuff together and fix things. Look up HTM workshop, facilitated by Brian Bell, he puts together a lot of different kits for kids to create circuit boards and create their own patient sim and soldering kits. Like he has a lot of these that he’s invested his time to actually create for folks. And it’s a really good way to get your kids into that technical aspect really early. How old’s your son?

Keri Stephens
He’s about to be six.

Chace Torres
Okay. I would think if not now, probably the next couple years, he should be within that age range to where he could, you know, dive into some of that, but I would just check it out. htm workshop. I’ll give you Brian a little plug there. Because I think it’s really cool what he’s put together for kids to learn off of?

Keri Stephens
No, that’s wonderful. Okay, so any parting thoughts? Anything people need to know what’s next for you, just give us a little teaser.

Chace Torres
The first thought is, I think I speak for a lot of people. And Keri, as always, you and your team do an amazing job. And I would encourage folks to subscribe to 24/7 If you haven’t already. I’ve been a subscriber for years, and you guys have a lot of valuable information, which, you know, it’s always good to be plugged into what’s going on. You know, there’s a lot of different media sources out there. And you know, we’re not all doing the same thing. We’re not capturing all the same thing. So it’s good to have a healthy mix of, you know, what’s available out there for folks. So that’d be one thing, and I appreciate you having me on here. And we need to, you know, revisit and relink more often. So the first year of fatherhood has been interesting. You never, you know, I was active duty for quite a while. So I was pretty used to not sleeping. And this is a different level, I will say that it’s hard to, you know, keep up with the industry sometimes. I will say folks probably will notice that my episodes are not dropping as frequently as often just because I just have a lot going on. And I’ve always been of the mindset that I would rather do a quality over a quantity product. So even though I’m not dishing out episodes every week, that is because I’m not just going to put out trash. I have some encouraging changes coming to where there’ll be more frequency of episodes, the format of beard balm is actually going to be changing here very soon. I just recently did a survey to a lot of the people that follow me and people want to have more of a format change so I’m gonna give them what they want. There will still be interviews from here and there but uh, we’re going to take this to two points Oh, so stay tuned in, keep an eye out for that. Other than that, that’s pretty much what I have going on. So I’ll be at AAMI. I’ll see you there. Any of you folks that are listening? I will also be at the Omaha symposium for the biomed symposium out there in August. I’ll be doing a keynote speaking out there. And yeah, I’m still seeing what other speaking engagements I’ll be doing later this year. But for now, that’s probably the most upcoming thing.

Keri Stephens
Well, thank you so much Chace. As always, it was great to have you on and to our listeners. Thank you so much. And be sure to check out www.24x7mag.com for the latest industry news and insights. Thank you. Take care

Transcribed by https://otter.ai

]]>
Racial Disparities in Healthcare: Skin Tone and Pulse Oximeters https://24x7mag.com/resource-center/podcasts/racial-disparities-in-medical-devices-skin-tone-and-pulse-oximeters/ Thu, 11 Apr 2024 23:30:38 +0000 https://24x7mag.com/?p=386490

On this epsiode of the 24×7 HTM Podcast, host Keri Stephens was joined by Dr. Scott Lucas, Vice President of device safety at ECRI, to explore the impact of racial inequities on the accuracy of medical devices, specifically pulse oximeters.

The conversation delved into how these devices might perform differently based on skin tone, potentially affecting the medical care provided to people with darker skin.

Pulse oximeters have been shown to sometimes give less accurate readings for individuals with darker skin tones. This is because darker skin absorbs more light, which can interfere with the device’s ability to accurately measure blood oxygen levels. Lucas explained the technical aspects of how pulse oximeters function and why this discrepancy can be clinically significant, especially when patients are on the borderline of needing medical intervention.

The discussion also covered recent public attention to this issue, heightened during the COVID-19 pandemic when home use of pulse oximeters increased significantly. Recent studies comparing device readings with actual blood draws have confirmed the variability in accuracy, prompting the FDA to focus on improving device testing and standards.

Dr. Lucas highlighted that current FDA guidance requires more representation of diverse skin tones in the testing phases of device development to improve accuracy across all patient populations. The proposed guidelines include methods like the Monk Skin Tone Scale, which provides a more detailed representation of various skin tones.

Addressing how these findings could impact healthcare more broadly, Dr. Lucas emphasized the importance of ensuring that medical devices are designed and tested to be effective for all racial groups. This is particularly critical as medical technology, including AI, continues to evolve.

Podcast Transcript

Keri Stephens
Hi, welcome to the HTM 24/7 podcast. I’m your host, Keri Stephens. For this episode, I’m joined by Dr. Scott Lucas, ECRI’s Vice President of device safety to talk about an issue that’s garnered a lot of headlines lately, racial equity and medical devices, particularly Scott is going to talk about pulse oximeters. Because ECRI experts say people, people with darker skin tones may receive less accurate information than their white counterparts. And it’s a subject we really want to delve into from a medical device standpoint. So Scott, thanks for joining me today.

Scott Lucas
Thank you. It’s great to be here. Appreciate your time.

Keri Stephens
Yeah, this is this is really an interesting subject. And to start, how do pulse oximeter’s accuracy vary based on skin tone, and what does this mean for patients? That’s a

Scott Lucas
great question. So I think it would help to understand possibly how pulse oximeter is work. And then we’ll get into the skin tone piece of this. And it’s very, very, basically a pulse oximeter, as you’re used to it with a probe on your finger or adhesive on your finger. It shines two beams of light by led through your tissue, and then a sensor on the other end picks up the light. So your oxygenated blood absorbs infrared light, deoxygenated blood absorbs the red light. And that ratio is then calculated as a pulse ox or blood saturation level. So ideally, it would be nice that we’d have nothing else absorbing the light. So we were just looking at the blood, whether it’s oxygenated or not. But in reality, we have bone and other tissue that’s absorbing some of that light. So it’s a little bit more difficult to comprehend. Now skin tone, if it’s darker, that also absorbs light. So what happens is potentially, you get a situation where you have a normal reading for pulse ox, when in fact, the actual blood oxygen saturation is a few percent less than that normal reading.

Keri Stephens
Okay, no, that makes sense. So what recommendations exists to make pulse oximeters more accurate for everyone?

Scott Lucas
Yes, good question. So and just to continue a little bit from the prior, I mean, if we have to think about it from clinical significance, right, so in most of the time, if a if a patient is adequately perfused, and adequately saturated, then a couple percentage of their variation isn’t that big of a deal, because it doesn’t require clinical intervention. The problem becomes when the pulse, the actual pulse ox may drop to like 88%, or something where clinical intervention is generally needed. In reality, the pulse ox will read something higher like 91% 92%, and then a clinical decision might not be made. So that’s one component of accuracy. And the broader component is how do Pulse ox is how do we you know, ensure their accuracy and I think of it from several different perspectives, you know, usability human factors, interoperability, the pulse ox very, I mean, a simple example should be that, it the probe needs to be tight on the finger or the ear lobe or the toe, and not move around, have motion artifact. Interoperability, the connections should be secure. If it’s a, you know, a standalone unit that’s different. But if it’s a has a console, or if it’s connected to a patient monitor, all those connections should be secure. The software’s associated with them should all be compatible. So pulse oximeters have alarms built in, and that should be compatible with the patient monitor that’s, that’s connected to. So it’s a system is a system approach to make sure everything’s playing and working together properly. There’s also more advancements, I mean, pulse ox has been around for many years, let’s say the modern technology even for decades, but now we’re getting more sophisticated. So it’s an which improves accuracy. So things like being able to identify noise and filter it out of the signal, or being able to account for poor perfusion and still give a appropriate saturation level. You know, things like that are now improvements. iteratively as the technology gets more mature, yeah.

Keri Stephens
You mentioned, you know, the technology obviously getting more sophisticated. So why do you think now the public has been more made more aware of the racial inequity and pulse oximeters?

Scott Lucas
Good question that, you know, it’s, this has been a kind of a known issue, at least anecdotally, for a long time. Like, if you talk to nurses in the field or clinicians They may anecdotally say, Oh yes, I was aware that if we had a patient with a darker skin tone, I just needed to be extra careful. pulse oximetry, by the way is always an adjunct and complement to care. It’s not the only diagnostic tool. So it’s always considered that way. But it’s been sort of a known issue. But, you know, I think recently, it’s risen because or escalated because of the pandemic. And you think about how prolific pulse oximeter is where at home, and people using pulse ox and he said, to get a saturation level and a temperature as a diagnostic tool to help determine if we had COVID or not, and talk to our provider. So there was all this, these issues, then around that. And then there’s some recent studies, too, that have shown have done this comparison to, you know, using pulse oximetry, from the device with actually a blood draw, and determine that there is a variability in a scientific method. So yes, it’s an issue. It’s been addressed, raised and addressed. And now the FDA is really focused on it.

Keri Stephens
Well, I also want to focus on what ECRI is doing, what exactly is ECRI doing to understand and improve pulse oximeter accuracy?

Scott Lucas
So like any medical device or patient safety issue, we take a comprehensive approach to that, you know, and that ranges from understanding what the market is, what the devices are out there doing market intelligence reports and things like that. doing clinical understanding clinical evidence, and clinical outcomes associated with the use of devices. And, and benchtop testing human factors, testing it through our device safety program. So we have engineers, clinicians, human factors, engineers, all looking at Pulse ox and other devices from a comprehensive approach, then post market to so we want to analyze and look at all the recalls of hazards and safety, communications, anything post market, we tried to grab and have reported to us through our patient safety organization, or straight from our users that that can help us understand all these issues. So we put it all together, come up with the best recommendations possible on safety with pulse ox and then any device and just publish it, send it out to our customers send it out to the public. Talk about it at the FDA, or any any kind of professional societies, any forum that shares our mission. You know, we want to share this information.

Keri Stephens
I want to get back to the FDA now. So what were the main points discussed in the FDA meeting about pulse oximeter performance? Can we delve into that a little more?

Scott Lucas
Sure. So in up until now, or I guess the last, let’s say 10 plus years, the guidance for development of pulse oximeter is included to have a patient population represented. But it was somewhat has been somewhat vague as far as how many people with different skin tones should be represented in that cohort. So it’s like two who was I think two patients or two patients who subjects should be of a darker skin tone. But that’s, that’s vague. What does that mean? So now, it’s more the recommendations from the FDA, which are out for public comment, and were being discussed in this meeting include increasing the number of subjects, and also having a more accurate representation of the patient population, included in the subjects that are used to help design that device. So it gets more specific that in that there are two methods proposed to test for skin tone in that cohort. And those are one of them’s called Monk Skin Tone, MST. So that’s a more comprehensive assessment of the different kinds of skin tones across the population, and more accurate. And it’s gotten the attention of nationals security, Google, using Google images, all these other broad platforms have recognized that this is a more up to date and more accurate representation of skin tones, especially in the darker continuum with skin tones. So that’s that’s what the FDA is discussing. And then basically how to do it, how to how to assess the skin tones how to use colorimeter devices and to quantify skin tone, you know, and how to go about that. So we’re having that we had a meeting meeting recently at the FDA with with multiple stakeholders, we were there. device manufacturers, were there, patient safety advocates, and it was really a good comprehensive meeting. And everybody was essentially in agreement that yes, this is a good idea. Now it’s how do we get it done? So that’s where we’re at now.

Keri Stephens
That’s interesting and helpful. So how can the lessons learned from pulse oximeter accuracy help address racial disparities in healthcare as a whole?

Scott Lucas
Yeah, that’s a that’s a great question. It’s, it’s so important. I think one thing that has come to light in this example is that the whatever the population that the device is intended to be used on should be represented in the design and development of the device. It should not the color of someone’s skin should have no impact on the quality of health care that they receive zero, it should all be the same. Yeah, so we have to that has to be represented in the design of the device, especially now you think about these are standalone devices, Pulse ox is right. Right, especially if you start thinking about artificial intelligence, and where we’re going with that the data that that technology is trained on should be representative of the of the patient population in which it’s deployed. So that’s it, I mean, we have to be accurate in the development of the device to better represent our patient population.

Keri Stephens
Great. So as a last question, our audience is the healthcare technology management profession. So what would you like to tell the members of the HTM profession about this, or just racial equity in general, and healthcare? Well,

Scott Lucas
I think that we love to hear from everyone for one and htm and in other venues about these types of issues. And I know that a lot of folks listening to this are our partners and customers. And so we love to hear from all stakeholders. So I mean, contact us with these issues, we’ll work to develop, you know, safety strategies and recommendations. And that could be individual to folks or just being able to publish broader on a broader scale to forums like the FDA, but I’d say just stay vigilant. I mean, it’s if a device shows up from a vendor and a facility then question it, you know, where, what’s the data? Where’s the data? What’s this device validated on? Is this appropriate for our patient population and have healthcare disparity front and center when when considering a big purchase? It’s important and we shouldn’t take it for granted.

Keri Stephens
Well, thank you so much, Scott. I mean, this was very informative to me and I know to our listeners as well, and to our listeners, thank you as well and be sure to visit www.24x7mag.com for the latest industry news and insights. Thank you again, take care.

]]>
Next-Gen Leadership: Addressing HTM’s Talent Gap https://24x7mag.com/resource-center/podcasts/next-gen-leadership-aami-on-addressing-htms-talent-gap/ Fri, 09 Feb 2024 19:29:59 +0000 https://24x7mag.com/?p=385909

In this episode of the HTM 24×7 podcast, host Keri Stephens is joined by one of the top luminaries in the healthcare technology management (HTM) field, Danielle McGeary, AAMI’s vice president of HTM.

During the podcast, McGeary shares insights into AAMI’s recently refreshed Leadership Development Guide: A Resource for Healthcare Technology Management Professionals, a comprehensive resource designed to empower individuals aspiring to advance their careers within the HTM field. Over the years, HTM has seen significant changes, with new certifications and evolving skill sets, making it essential to update resources like the leadership guide to reflect the current landscape accurately, McGeary explains.

The conversation delves into the demographic shifts within HTM, highlighting the impending mass exodus of seasoned professionals and the urgent need for new leadership to fill the void. With approximately 60% of HTM field managers over the age of 55, the guide becomes crucial in preparing the next generation of leaders.

Key topics discussed include the importance of soft skills alongside technical proficiency, strategies for interviewing for senior-level positions, and the top three soft skills essential for success in HTM: effective verbal and written communication, organizational skills, and attention to detail.

Listeners gain valuable insights into the nuances of leadership within the HTM field, including the distinction between being a manager and being a leader. Finally, the conversation emphasizes the significance of continuous self-assessment and development, encouraging individuals at all career stages to utilize resources like the Leadership Development Guide: A Resource for Healthcare Technology Management Professionals to chart their professional growth.

Podcast Transcript

Keri Stephens
Hi, welcome to htm 24/7 podcast. I’m your host, Keri Stephens. For this episode, I’m joined by one of the biggest names in htm right now, Danielle McGeary, who is AAMI’s vice president of htm. Danielle, thank you for joining me today.

Danielle McGeary
Hi, Keri, thanks for having me today. I always love coming on your podcast,

Keri Stephens
we love having you. And we had a really good conversation. I think it was a little over a year ago. So I’m just glad to have you back. So I’m glad you invited me back. Oh my gosh, you’re always welcome. So whenever you want to come on, please do. But um, so let’s just start get into this. AAMI just developed an htm leadership guide. Let’s talk about that.

Danielle McGeary
Yeah, absolutely. So we’ve actually had the HTM Leadership Development Guide for, I don’t know, about eight years now. But what we did was we refreshed it, we’ve had so many new resources come out over the years new certifications, that the guide was really outdated. So we took the time to update the guide. And it’s really a great resource for anyone that’s looking to move up in the HTM field take on a leadership type position, a manager position. And it’s also great for managers in the field to want to be able to mentor and lead, you know, they’re up and comers into the next position in their organization.

Keri Stephens
Yeah, and one of the things we’ve really found, you know, from our HTM salary survey is, you know, people are retiring and there is a massive need for new blood to come into the field to learn new skills or new leadership skills. Was that part of that, too, that, you know, the refresh looking at the demographic change? Absolutely.

Danielle McGeary
I mean, we also did a demographic survey that kind of parallels your salary survey. And we found that about 60% of the fields managers are over the age of 55. So that shows in the next 10 to 15 years, there’s going to be a huge mass exodus, and those people leaving are our long term seasoned technicians, and managers with all that historical knowledge and skill set that you just can’t learn, you know, day one on the job. So we really have to do a good job at preparing our future workforce to take on those senior technician and managerial type roles. So this guide will really help htm professionals move into those types of positions. So it really gives like a step by step process, like suggestions, like getting certifications, like your CHTM, your CBET or the CAPT if you’re just entering the field, obviously, you know, that’s the entry level certification, but it really starts that trajectory. And that process of getting, you know, starting certification from the beginning of your career. It also talks about good skills to have, such as you know, public speaking, you know, leadership development, project management, all things like that. So, it’s really a great resource.

Keri Stephens
Yeah, and I did want to talk about the step by step. So in the guy, there’s a section on getting started. So can you share some key insights from the section for listeners who might be interested in advancing their careers and htm?

Danielle McGeary
Yeah, I mean, I think, you know, it always starts with a willingness to learn, right. And in the leadership guide, there’s also in the back, there’s a checklist in like a note section where you can actually evaluate yourself against the matrix that’s in there. So you can kind of say, Okay, I need to really brush up on my project management skills, or maybe difficult conversations and things of that nature. So you can really go through it and kind of rate yourself, I think it’s on a one to five scale. And you can kind of see where you feel you’re good at, where you need some development. And it’s really a way to really open a conversation with your existing management because you can say, hey, you know, I need the skills, but I feel like, I need help really getting to the level of being able to, you know, feel comfortable having a difficult conversation with an employee, maybe I need to take a course or maybe I need some mentoring on that. And that’s really what this guy does, it really shows you those bare bones skills that are really needed to become a good leader.

Keri Stephens
And I think too, especially in this industry, because it’s such a tech, heavy interest industry, you know, it’s important to really talk about the soft skills because those are necessary to move up. I mean, you can’t just be technically proficient, you have to have the soft skills, the emotional, you know, EQ skills. So I think this is really great.

Danielle McGeary
agreed in it. I think that’s you know, you can be the best, you can be the best technician, but if you can’t communicate, you know, especially even understanding like what the C suite needs to know, and what clinicians want to know, right? When they’re, you know, MRI is down, for instance, they don’t care what specific component is broken on the MRI, it’s great that you know that to be able to fix it, but they want to know, you know, what’s wrong with it? How long will it be down? You know, when will we get parts? And how does it affect patient care? You know, do we need to divert patients? Do we need to send them elsewhere? Is this going to be down for a week? Or for a few hours? How do we, you know, figure out, you know, in a, you know, an emergency plan, if we need that to send patients elsewhere, maybe you know, you’re at a place that have multiple MRIs, and you’ll have to run off with one, but how does that affect, you know, patients scheduling, you know, so there’s, you know, the clinicians are really thinking about patient care, not that, you know, a part of a little what particular part of the board is broken, inside it or whatnot. So, you know, it’s really important, you know, those soft skills and being able to effectively communicate and speak their same language. No,

Keri Stephens
absolutely. And so the guide also addresses interviewing for leadership roles. Can you share some of the top techniques for interviewing for senior level positions? And what are some common mistakes that people interviewing should avoid?

Danielle McGeary
You know, I would say the common mistakes, even from people that I’ve interviewed in the past is really coming off too cocky. Okay, no feeling like, they know more than you. And, you know, I also in and I would also say, when you’re interviewing for higher level positions, it’s really important to be able to, like I said, effectively communicate that clinical talk to be able to translate technical jargon into clinical talk. And in just to be able, I think, to really come across as sincere and have a sense of empathy. You know, at the end of the day, you know, when you we interview so many people, and you can tell just from their voice, their demeanor, who really cares about this role, who really understands the path to the patient, and who doesn’t. And I think, you know, I remember interviewing someone once and asking them, you know, what their weakness was, and they told me, they didn’t have one. And I think, you know, in their mind, they thought, wow, you know, I’m going to show her that I’m perfect. But the fact that they said they didn’t have a weakness is a weakness in itself. And being able to admit, you know, when you know, you need mentoring or counsel or maybe being able to say, I’m sorry to apologize when you’ve done something wrong, and just being able to relate to others around you, you know, when, when you come off that arrogant, probably, for lack of a better word, that doesn’t sit well with others, that doesn’t sit well in health care. And, and I think at the end of the day, just being genuinely passionate about what you do, you know, say fueled by passion, will, will really get you much further, and people can see that in interviews, whether you’re on the phone, or whether you’re in person. And I think just really being able to connect with others that way, I think really goes a long way and makes a difference.

Keri Stephens
So if you had to rate in your opinion to and input the guy, like the top three soft skills that you think every biomed should have, what would you say they are the

Danielle McGeary
top three soft skills, I would say being able to communicate verbally being able to communicate in writing, and also being very organized and detail oriented, because, you know, you need to be able to, to follow a process, whether it’s healthcare process, or the process to, to maintain or fix a device. You

Keri Stephens
know, I was having a talk with a friend the other day about this, because it’s like, you know, as artificial intelligence, you know, so much. And I’m not saying that’s in the biomed field, specifically, but so much is being automated with artificial intelligence, but really, it was what sets people apart. And what’s going to continue to set them apart is those soft skills, those human skills that people need to do their job that a computer could never do?

Danielle McGeary
Agreed, I mean, you’re never gonna, you know, I think you keep saying empathy, but I think computers are never going to replace, you know, empathy. And, you know, when it comes down to the clinicians and the people in the hospital, and I think just us being able to understand, you know, I always say, you know, when I talk to students, and I think this also applies, you know, while we’re talking about leadership and leadership development, is being able to understand the equipment and how it’s used clinically. I always tell the students you know, when you’re interning if you have the opportunity to scrub into a case and see how the equipment is being used, you know, on the patient’s understanding all the people in the O R in their functions. What’s done to get that device up and running. You know, it just makes you more valuable, because you’re not just talking about a device, now you’re talking about a workflow, you’re talking about patient care, you understand more than just the device. And when you’re able to really, you know, connect with the clinicians and really understand their jobs, I think that’s really when you become a leader, right? Because now, you’re not just thinking my optically in your day to day job and just, you know, break fix, you’re thinking about the whole continuity of care how that device affects the patient, the clinician in whole HDO in general. So you know, it’s really important, if you have the opportunity to learn that, and really take the time to see clinically how everything is used. It just makes you that much more valuable. And when you think about even moving up beyond, if you want to move outside of htm, until like a hospital C suite, you know, you need to understand that you have to understand how everything ties together from the financial piece to the, you know, coding, HR, you know, the engineering side, everything works together harmoniously. So hospitals work, and we have a piece in that, but understanding how those other pieces of the puzzle fit together. So everything works harmoniously is really important as well.

Keri Stephens
No, that’s great. And just for a final question, so this documents free to AAMI members, but can be purchased for the AAMI store for those who are not members of AAMI. But why should people use this resource? How can it help those in the HTM field? Well, it was developed

Danielle McGeary
by htm leaders for htm leaders, so you’re really getting an inside view of what the best of the best really feel you need to do to succeed. These are people who have done it who have succeeded in their positions. And you’re getting in the insider scoop almost. And it really is a step by step guide, it was really created to help. We also have, we have the leadership development guide. And we also have the career guide as well. The Career Guide is more focused on those starting out in htm understanding what they need to succeed in their career as they are and the leadership guide takes that career guide to the next level, and how to move into that next level position. And it also just want to be clear, too, that, you know, being a manager and being a leader are two different things. You know, you can be a manager and not a good leader. So this really helps you to lead. And you can be a technician and not have direct reports or be in a manager role and be a leader. So this helps you be a leader. So don’t sell yourself short either. And I think it’s definitely worth checking out. You know, it definitely makes you sit down and think about where you’re at in these key competency areas for being a leader. And you can score yourself and I think it’s just a great exercise for everyone to do. And really see, okay, this is where I’m at. And this is where I need development. And I think no matter where you are in your career and never hurts to take a step back, focus on you work on you, evaluate where you are, and see how you can be better. Now

Keri Stephens
that’s great. Thank you so much, Danielle. It’s as always, it’s such a pleasure to have you here. We love AAMI at 24/7. And we support all your endeavors. So just thank you.

Danielle McGeary
Oh, and we appreciate 24 x 7 too, we love your support of us. You know, thank you for doing the salary survey. We’re so happy to support it year after year.

Keri Stephens
It’s instrumental and just again, please everyone take the salary survey your insights really helped shape you know, salaries and htm field it’s so important that everyone just embraces a salary survey and takes it because we want to make sure everyone’s being paid fairly. So thank you so much, Danielle and to our listeners. Thank you all so and be sure to visit www.24x7mag.com For more industry news and insights. Thank you, take care.

]]>
Exploring Critical IoT Vulnerabilities with Noam Moshe https://24x7mag.com/resource-center/podcasts/exploring-critical-iot-vulnerabilities-with-noam-moshe/ Tue, 02 Jan 2024 16:41:00 +0000 https://24x7mag.com/?p=385469

Welcome to HTM 24/7: Unveiling IoT Security Threats

Welcome to a new episode of HTM 24/7, your go-to podcast for tech insights. Today, we’re thrilled to have Noam Moshe from Clarity’s Team 82. He’s here to shed light on a crucial cybersecurity topic.

Noam Moshe: Uncovering Router Vulnerabilities

Our focus today is an eye-opening discovery by Noam’s team. They’ve identified significant vulnerabilities in iOS ER 2000 edge routers. These findings are reshaping our understanding of IoT security.

The Heart of IoT: Why Routers Matter

Why focus on routers? Noam explains their role as IoT gateways. He highlights how critical they are in connecting devices, especially in sectors like healthcare.

Medical Devices at Risk: A Closer Look

Noam delves into the impact on medical devices. He discusses the dangers these vulnerabilities pose. It’s a deep dive into why protecting these devices is paramount for patient safety.

Understanding the Risks: Noam’s Insights

What are the risks? Noam breaks them down, emphasizing the potential for network breaches. His insights are invaluable for grasping the severity of these threats.

Proactive Measures: Safeguarding Our Connected World

Noam concludes with advice on protective measures. He stresses the need for vigilance and proactive security in IoT devices.

Podcast Transcript

Keri Stephens (00:06):

Hi, welcome to the HTM 24 7 Podcast. I’m your host, Carrie Stevens. For this episode, I’m joined by No Mosh, a vulnerability researcher at Clarity’s Team 82. Noam, thank you for joining me today.

Noam Moshe (00:20):

Thank you so much for inviting me. I’m super excited to be here today.

Keri Stephens (00:25):

Yeah, and I really just want to jump into this. So your team recently discovered [00:00:30] multiple critical vulnerabilities in connected iOS ER 2000 edge routers, which serve as gateways for internet of things or IOT devices. So can you talk about this in the context specifically of medical devices and why this area was chosen for your research?

Noam Moshe (00:48):

Yeah, for sure. So basically as intimidate two, we want to look at some kind of critical devices and interesting devices that could be somehow [00:01:00] very big and allow big exposure in the industry. And that’s why we chose looking at three and 4G routers, which basically act as a gateway, meaning you need to connect some kind of site to the internet and you might not have a physical cable or physical internet connection. Well, in those cases, you might want to implement and use a three or 4G router that acts as an internet gateway connecting your sites to the internet. Now this is actually pretty cool because when we’re talking [00:01:30] about these sites that are used in iot, basically connecting iot devices, be it manufacturing, remote site connectivity, medical, you name it, these sites are remote, are somewhere out there, and sometimes there’s not a way for attackers to go into these sites and leverage the way into these sites. However, some critical infrastructure is kept on these sites. So we thought to ourselves, how can we devise the new exploitation technique or [00:02:00] basically attack vector that could affect these sites and allow attackers, malicious attackers to leverage a way into the internal networks of basically any kind of organization, be it medical, be it in the realm of manufacturing, you name it, and that way we could see how attackers could basically infiltrate an internal network, an internal device network of such organizations.

Keri Stephens (02:26):

Well, our brand is obviously for medical devices, [00:02:30] so let’s get into the critical nature of medical devices, of patient’s safety concerns. So what are some of the risks associated with the vulnerabilities you discovered?

Noam Moshe (02:39):

So basically they could allow attackers to gain access to the actual physical devices. For example, a medical device that sits somewhere and might not be connected to the regular network, and that way it could allow attackers to access and leverage the way and basically get network access to these devices. [00:03:00] Now, a lot of the times, especially in the medical realms, we see kind of a realization that the devices are not secured by nature, not inherently secure because it might be the protocol is not secure. For example, if we’re talking about DICOM, for example, which is the protocol for medical imaging and modality test, it might not be the most secure protocol inherently, and in order to secure it, a lot of medical organizations choose to implement a very strict network rules basically denying any kind of attacker [00:03:30] into accessing their devices. Now, because we exploit the actual router that might actually block and drop the packets from the internet, the exposed internet, we are now able to access internal network that is very internal and only contains devices, and that way we can interact with networks and devices we are not supposed to. And that puts a lot of risk because these networks are not protected, sometimes not even monitored. They are sitting somewhere [00:04:00] basically not exposed. However, by abusing the vulnerabilities, we are able to expose them and attack them through the internet without requiring direct access, which is pretty cool.

Keri Stephens (04:13):

No, very cool. Yeah. So how did your research findings not only impact the routers but also the cloud-based device management platform use in healthcare settings?

Noam Moshe (04:25):

So we identified some actually architecture flaws, meaning we not [00:04:30] only found some vulnerabilities in a specific device or in the cloud platforms, although we did find some of these. We also find flaws within the architecture itself, meaning how devices connect, authenticate, and basically exchange messages with the cloud. And because we identified this architectures flaw, it means that basically we found flaws in the architecture and the infrastructure of connected iOS cloud. Along with that, we managed to basically gain access [00:05:00] to actual patient, not patient, but customer information, meaning all of the information that the devices are sending to the cloud, we were able to see them, meaning we are able to use and see the customer information of the connected devices, as well as actually we managed to identify some vulnerabilities that allow us to fully take over connected as IO cloud, meaning we’re able to execute code on their cloud servers.

Keri Stephens (05:29):

So with connected [00:05:30] IO providing firmware updates to address these vulnerabilities, what steps can healthcare organizations take to make sure their connected devices are secure post update?

Noam Moshe (05:43):

Yep. So like you’ve said, connected IO have done something pretty amazing and that shows their care for their customers because they actually work with us and fully fixed all of the we identified. [00:06:00] And because of that, they made sure that all of their customers are safe and are no longer vulnerable in regards to how can you protect yourselves in front of this kind of attacks? I believe the most important thing is knowing what kind of devices you have. If we’re talking about the medical network, a lot of the times the network admins are not even aware of all the different kinds of the iot [00:06:30] devices that are connected to their network and might introduce basically exposure and risk. So that’s the most critical stuff. And define and understanding what devices are at your network and how can you protect against those rogue devices that might make compromise by attackers.

Keri Stephens (06:54):

I mean, it seems to me that all of this kind of starts from the beginning with the medical device manufacturers. So [00:07:00] how do you want to address medical device manufacturers to making sure that their devices are secure before they put them out there?

Noam Moshe (07:07):

So I see a very increase in the industry of security. I mean, companies, especially medical companies, understand the inherent risk of vulnerabilities in their products, and they put more and more effort and put the products into more tests and more Q quality assurance and vulnerability researchers, et cetera, to make sure that the customers [00:07:30] itself, which might involve actually real life patients and might have physical damages, they want to ensure they are safe. And we are seeing an increase in the world of medical devices in regards to security concerns. However, I believe the most important stuff is being more transparent and working with the industry and allowing [00:08:00] people to test their devices. And we are seeing an increase of medical companies allowing us and other companies to work with them and basically present them vulnerabilities. We find, and I believe this is a critical step into making sure that the entire industry is safer.

Keri Stephens (08:17):

I know we do a salary survey every year and it kind of just looks at the whole industry and the people tell us the thing they’re most concerned with other than the aging out of the biomed field is cybersecurity. [00:08:30] I mean, that is always what these HTM professionals are telling us, but I always don’t think that the general public knows how insecure some of their medical devices are. So can you just talk about that? Should people be as concerned as a lot of the HTM professionals are about this? I mean, is it really that big of a deal?

Noam Moshe (08:54):

Well, I think we are seeing a more focus on cyber medical attacks [00:09:00] because when we’re talking about cyber medical attacks, we’re talking about physical damages, physical actual damages that could involve actually human lives or even when we’re talking about data leakage is a very, very sensitive data that should never be exposed. And we are seeing an increase in attacking groups and different kind of hackers or ransomware gangs that are targeting the medical field. In the past, [00:09:30] I believe that this field was less focused on which actually allowed it to be less secure, and we are seeing a lot of less secure, less encrypted, less security focused devices and protocols in the medical industry. And it is very concerning. However, I think the field is moving in the right direction, however, not fast enough, and it needs to move faster to make [00:10:00] sure that no actual damages actually could occur.

Keri Stephens (10:06):

Is there anything we didn’t cover that you want to tell our audience who are members of the HTM field?

Noam Moshe (10:13):

I believe the most hard part is understanding the risk because you are never aware what is running at your network and what is running under the hood. I mean, I’m buying a router, for example. I am not sure what’s actually [00:10:30] running there behind the plastics. And that is a very major security concern because it might be compromised and I’ll never know it. In order to remedy this risk, we must basically expand our security posture and build a security by layers, meaning we must do proper network hygiene and say, if this kind of device or this edge router [00:11:00] might be compromised, how am I protecting my network and making sure that all of my patients and all my customers are safe? I believe it needs to be built in layers, meaning let’s say this thing is compromised, how am I basically covering it in another field? And that’s the only way making sure your security posture itself is very robust and protected against all of these kind of attacks.

Keri Stephens (11:30):

[00:11:30] Well, thank you. Thank you so much Noam. And to our listeners, be sure to check out 24 7 x mag.com for more information. Thank you. Take care.

 

]]>
Optimizing HTM Strategy to Drive Clinical, Operational, and Financial Outcomes  https://24x7mag.com/maintenance-strategies/asset-management/how-to-enhance-clinical-uptime-and-efficiency-in-htm/ Wed, 04 Oct 2023 14:51:51 +0000 https://24x7mag.com/?p=384808

In this episode of the HTM 24×7 podcast, PartsSource President and CEO Phil Settimi, MD, MSE, joins host Keri Stephens delve into the key challenges within healthcare technology management (HTM), particularly parts and service contracts. Dr. Settimi’s background as a physician and his experience in medical device businesses laid the foundation for his involvement with PartsSource, a company dedicated to enhancing clinical uptime and streamlining the healthcare supply chain.

PartsSource began by analyzing data on supplier performance and realized the potential to transform the healthcare supply chain by applying evidence-based decision-making and technology. Their initial focus was on parts and accessories procurement, and they introduced PartsSource Pro, a technology-enabled solution that streamlined procurement processes, reduced costs, and improved productivity for hospitals.

The podcast also delves into PartsSource’s study of service contracts within healthcare systems. They found that health systems manage a significant number of contracts, with varying costs and a lack of transparency. Many hospitals are challenged by the complexity of managing these contracts, leading to inefficiencies and potential overpayments. Furthermore, the absence of vendor performance monitoring and a lack of standardized data make it difficult for health systems to evaluate and optimize their service contracts effectively.

In the podcast, Dr. Settimi suggests several strategies for overcoming these challenges, including consolidation and rationalization of contracts, risk-based analysis for vendor selection, and the use of national benchmarks to determine fair pricing. The implementation of technology plays a crucial role in streamlining workflows, monitoring vendor performance, and achieving cost savings.

Finally, the podcast emphasizes the need for evidence-based, tech-enabled solutions in HTM to improve clinical uptime and support healthcare professionals in delivering safe and effective care.

 

Podcast Transcript

Keri Stephens: Hi, welcome to the 24×7 Podcast. I’m your host, Keri Stephens. For this episode, I’m joined by Dr. Phil Settimi, PartsSource’s president and CEO Dr. Settimi thank you for joining me today.

Dr. Philip Settimi: Hey, it’s great to be here.

Keri Stephens: Yeah, we’re very excited to have you. And I really want to, just to start, can you tell us about your background and part source for listeners who may not be familiar with the company?

Dr. Philip Settimi: Sure, happy to. I started life as a physician and spent roughly a decade working for medical device businesses, largely developing integrated connectivity software for those devices. How do you help those devices share critical patient data with the EMR building EMRs and decision support systems for EMRs and got to PartsSource in 2014 and discovered a really interesting business that served a huge amount of the hospital and healthcare community out there. Had relationships with thousands of suppliers, was playing a really crucial role. And at the time, our hypothesis was they’ve got some interesting data.

Keri Stephens: Oh, really? What kind of data?

Dr. Philip Settimi: The company had 20 years of longitudinal data on supplier performance and as I mentioned, served many thousands of hospitals every year. I think the question we had at the time was, what if you took this data and applied a lot of the decision support concepts and algorithms that we were using in clinical medicine for operational performance in healthcare? And specifically, could you in fact improve clinical uptime around devices by leveraging a more resilient, more reliable supply chain, specifically by looking at data around whether they had particular items in stock, whether they shipped those on time, whether those products worked when they landed, whether they last their warranty period. And could quality and supply chain resiliency play a role in the future of this part of healthcare?

 

Ultimately, that’s the business that we push forward on moving this business that was largely a distributor of parts at the time and accessories into an enterprise technology partner that would help healthcare organizations drive the outcomes they were looking for, which is, can I spend less money doing this work lowering my total cost of service? Could I improve the productivity of my field staff and ultimately, could I use evidence-based outcome data to improve the supplier selection and supplier supply chain that, ultimately, we supported.

Keri Stephens: What did PartsSource do with those insights?

Dr. Philip Settimi: We had that view that suppliers and vendors perform differently. Our thought was we could turn that into something useful, a decision support tool for our customers. When we went out and spoke to customers about this, we observed not only could they use that, but they frankly just had a process that resulted in really slow procurement, which meant parts and accessories weren’t getting to end users and clinical engineers when they needed it. They really didn’t have the backup resources or support that they needed.

They really didn’t have any specific buying power. And so, we came back to the healthcare community with this concept of PartsSource Pro, a technology-enabled solution that would leverage buying power, would leverage real-time analytical insights, provide supplier performance metrics, digitize the existing workflow really to address the problems we observed on a turnkey basis. And that solution that we presented in 2015 initially became very popular with thousands of hospitals adopting it as a solution set, and, ultimately, we began focused on where else they were spending a lot of time, money, and effort to keep the clinical environment up and running.

In our initial work with parts, we took a really evidence-based approach to the problem, and we went out and did a survey of hundreds of hospitals. After speaking with dozens of them, began to do more quantitative surveying of those clients and ultimately discovered that many of those hospitals had the same issues. They were buying parts from hundreds of vendors at a time, but largely on one-off analog processes to do that.

 They were typically spending 10% to 15% more than was required than what the benchmarks would tell you those parts could be acquired at. They really didn’t have any quality performance metrics for assessing the quality or resiliency of these supply partners, and they really didn’t have any common platform for doing this work. And that really, as I mentioned, led to the introduction of PartsSource Pro for parts initially back in the 2015 window where you could achieve quality outcomes, you could achieve cost outcomes, and you could achieve productivity outcomes that were unique to this market.

Keri Stephens: Great. Well, it sounds like you really resolved the problems related to parts. Is that what led you to study contracts?

Dr. Philip Settimi: Fast forward now a handful of years, and now with over 1500 enterprise clients across the US that have adopted PartsSource Pro, we began to look at this opportunity in the service contract space largely because it represents the largest pocket of spend for many of those organizations that we serve today.

It’s a 10 billion category nationwide, and we come at this problem from the point of view that our job is to help root out waste and inefficiency in an evidence-based approach on behalf of our clients. And very quickly we focused on the repair and service agreement space, which we refer to as RSA. And so, we began this evaluation a couple of years ago to look at small samples of contracts across our client base. And what we found was interesting.

So, hospitals on average were managing somewhere between 102 hundred contracts at one time. They were spending significant amount of time to manage, renew, and implement those contracts, and they were disproportionately lower dollar contracts with highly varied pricing. They also didn’t seem to have a lot of vendor performance management data that was helping them guide those vendor decisions. And we came away from that pilot data exercise with really this notion that we should explore this further. And so we took the opportunity to then do a much larger study.

Keri Stephens: Okay. Was this analysis comparable to the parts studies that you referenced?

Dr. Philip Settimi: Yeah, we took a very similar approach, hundreds of hospital data across 500,000 service events, over a hundred thousand contracts, and in total over 35 million proprietary data points that we evaluated. And we felt like we wanted to provide an independent nationwide survey that would help inform clients around what the state of the union in this area is and potentially share best practices to the extent that we discovered them in the course of the study.

Keri Stephens: Let’s walk through some of those findings because some were really eye-opening to me. How many contracts are systems managing?

Dr. Philip Settimi: We found that an average hospital is managing 146 contracts, and it really is a tale of classic 80/20 or in this case 75/25. And that is that while most of the dollar spend is in the 25% of contracts that are being managed, most of the work is sitting in the 75% of contracts where the value of the contract is under $50,000 per year, but they still consume a disproportionate amount of time and energy. And so, what we observed in our research was that each contract was consuming roughly 100 or just over 100 days of team time between negotiation management, contracting, deployment, follow-up and implementation and so on.

And so, therefore, four to six months to truly renew and activate these contracts. So significant amount of time spent on what is a really long tail of contracts that are required for health systems to manage. And so again, if you’re spending all that time and you’re getting a lot of value out of it, that can be meaningful. But what we observed was actually pretty interesting when it came to pricing.

Keri Stephens: Okay. So that gives me an idea of how much time systems are spending, but did you find the same issues with contract costs as you did on parts?

Philip Settimi: Yeah, we identified a really interesting range of pricing for really the very same equipment. And so take a really common medical device here in the us, an O E C 9,800 C-arm, we found 519 unique prices in service contracts in our dataset. And it’s not unusual to see the very different prices for the exact same model within the exact same health system either. Again, consistent with what we found in the parts universe.

What’s interesting is that the range, in addition to being different and unique prices, the range was dramatic 57% priced range from the least to the most expensive across this basket. And so the question really is we’re spending all this time on it, how do we know that we’re actually getting great pricing if there really isn’t price transparency? And as a result, health systems are vulnerable to overpaying here.

Keri Stephens: No, that makes sense. Okay, so this lack of data seems to be a theme. Where else are systems suffering from a lack of evidence?

Dr. Philip Settimi: What we observed was a couple of areas. I think perhaps most important is vendor performance monitoring. 90 plus percent of the health systems we spoke with did not have a vendor performance management system or tool or methodology. And so you may have a set of entitlements within your contract, but how do you know if you’re actually achieving those entitlements and getting what you paid for?

Because there’s very little structured or quantitative data shared back with the health system, it’s difficult for those groups to assess not just any one contract, but again, we’re talking about a huge number across potentially dozens or hundreds of vendors. The systems, the data, the processes that people just are not set up to effectively survey and monitor and manage that vendor base. I would say the second comes down to we observe wide variation in service strategy selection within the modality or category, and that is to say within lab or within patient monitoring or within CT, we saw a huge variation in the kinds of service strategies deployed by health system to health system, and each were achieving various successful outcomes.

The question is, which is the right approach for the kinds of capabilities in those health systems? And it would tell you from the diversity of what we observed is that there’s a lot of ways to solve these problems. There wasn’t necessarily an obvious best practice because folks didn’t have the outcome data to evaluate their relative strategies. As a result, I think on the last piece is if you really don’t have a good sense for supplier performance metrics or uptime metrics and necessarily financial metrics, it’s pretty difficult to put together a comprehensive enterprise-wide cost to service assessment that ultimately informs your service strategy. So, lots of areas here where health systems would have the opportunity to improve if they had better structured and integrated data to work from.

Keri Stephens: Definitely. Okay, so based on these findings and the financial pressure systems are under now more than ever, it really seems like a new approach to service contract management is overdue. So how can systems overcome these challenges?

Dr. Philip Settimi: We observed the best health systems had taken a couple of really thoughtful approaches that we believed were more widely adoptable across the industry. One, they really had worked to consolidate and rationalize this long tail of service contracts. Two, they were finding ways to take evidence-based approaches on vendor selection, on contract selection, and they were increasingly using risk-based analysis to determine what they could be doing in-house versus where they need to bring partners in to help perform service.

We observed that the best were achieving cost savings of upwards of 50% from their existing contract costs when they evolve their service strategy. And the best were really adept at managing asset level service costs and performance metrics to evaluate contract performance, but also evaluate their overall service strategy. And they were leveraging national benchmarks on these contracts in the first place to determine whether they had good pricing.

These individual capabilities, I would say weren’t found at any one health system, and I would say any of these capabilities were found in a small minority of health systems. So, the opportunity here is how do we take these observable best practices and help a broader set of clients across the U.S. take advantage of those kinds of features.

For us, we observe that in the parts world, if you could consolidate the workflow related to a broad set of issues for teams today, like vendor engagement or service dispatch requests, like documentation for field service events like payments, like in the area of collecting data, having a single enterprise workflow tool is a really powerful way to improve the productivity of teams and improve the speed with which you can deploy these service strategies, which today, although perhaps made centrally, are often difficult to deploy locally in a short period of time and have the necessary impact.

Two, we believe that community buying power can be a powerful lever here. Aggregating demand across health systems, leveraging benchmark data to determine what the right expense point should be for these service contracts is a really powerful capability and one that we believe we can help clients with. Third, how do we use the same evidence-based approach that we took in parts and apply that same logic into service vendor management in the service contract space so that we’re leveraging the concept of formularies or enterprise preferences where you can actually select the highest quality performing vendors in any particular geography, both OEMs and third parties alike.

The way you do that is by having true nationally benchmarked vendor performance data. And so those insights and KPIs, peer reviews on vendor performance ratings, first time fixed rates, et cetera, all of that is used to drive not only the management of individual vendors, but increasingly where we want to allocate more of our service dollars through vendor preferences and formulary selection in particular geographies or particular modalities around the country to help reinforce high quality cost-effective solutions in a tech enabled manner.

And that tech piece plays such a powerful role in weaving together all these capabilities from workflow to real-time updates about the status of your service technician to outcome data related to the performance of your vendors to handling digital documentation payments. And so collectively, this digital transformation of the work serves to both eliminated a huge amount of time from the negotiation deployment of a contract, the engagement of that vendor community, and ultimately the productivity, perhaps the scarcest resource, which are our clinical engineering teams across the country these days with an increasing number of folks retiring or coming out of the field.

We really need to focus as we have in the rest of medicine on improving the top of licensed work that nursing professionals and physician professionals can deliver to other folks involved in clinical operations like clinical engineering, facilities management, and so on.

Keri Stephens: Great. Well, as a final question, is there anything we didn’t cover and how can listeners find out more?

Dr. Philip Settimi: Well, there’s so much around this space in clinical engineering that we at PartsSource are excited to help promote and enable. I think we wake up every day thinking about how to bring evidence-based tech-enabled solutions to clinical engineering programs around the country in support of their mission of driving high clinical uptime, which ultimately delivers caregivers the ability to have well-functioning safe and effective care. They can deliver patients every day.

And those are the kind of problems that we really love to spend time on. We’ve taken this model of PartsSource Pro, a tech enabled managed service initially for parts now for service and service contracts, and we’ll continue to innovate in that direction. We’re always looking for, I think, innovative folks that are excited to help transform this industry and this profession. And folks can, of course, always learn more@partssource.com at our corporate site or connect with any of the account folks that are no doubt calling on them with regularity to engage on these kinds of issues. But we appreciate the time to share our perspective, and thanks for your time today.

Keri Stephens: Well, thank you so much, Dr. Settimi. This has been very informative, and I know our listeners will agree. And to our listeners, be sure to check out 24x7mag.com for the latest news and insights impacting the healthcare technology management field. Take care.

]]>
Medical Device Cybersecurity: How It’s Impacting Health Systems and the BMETs Serving Them https://24x7mag.com/resource-center/podcasts/medical-device-cybersecurity-how-its-impacting-health-systems-and-the-bmets-serving-them/ Thu, 27 Jul 2023 12:09:19 +0000 https://24x7mag.com/?p=384028

Join 24×7 chief editor Keri Forsythe-Stephens as she sits down with cybersecurity expert Scott Trevino to delve into the pressing issue of medical device cybersecurity. As senior vice president for cybersecurity at comprehensive clinical asset management service provider TRIMEDX, Trevino shares how he stays at the forefront of cybersecurity trends, with a keen focus on medical devices. Moreover, he reveals his pivotal role in developing cutting-edge cybersecurity solutions for TRIMEDX’s clients, aiming to fortify their defense against evolving cyber threats.

The podcast provides a comprehensive analysis of the current state of healthcare cybersecurity. Trevino points out that the healthcare industry, particularly medical devices, has lagged significantly behind other critical infrastructure sectors in terms of cybersecurity maturity. He cites alarming statistics, showcasing a staggering 200% increase in ransomware attacks in the past five years.

He also highlights the severe impact of cyberattacks on patient care, clinicians, and HTM professionals. Trevino emphasizes that delays in treatment due to cyber incidents result in a 30%-plus increase in direct patient harm or complications, profoundly affecting patient outcomes.

The conversation turns to the legislation and regulations surrounding medical device cybersecurity. And Trevino discusses the recent legislative actions empowering the U.S. FDA to enforce cybersecurity requirements on medical device manufacturers. However, he warns against relying solely on legislation and encourages healthcare providers to proactively assess and improve their cybersecurity practices.

Finally, Trevino shares how TRIMEDX has launched a revolutionary cybersecurity solution called Vigilor. This product provides comprehensive cybersecurity services to hospitals, even those without TRIMEDX’s clinical engineering program. Scott discusses how Vigilor works collaboratively with existing biomed teams and IT departments to assess risks and drive improvement. To learn more about Vigilor from TRIMEDX or to request a Cyber Current State Assessment, visit trimedx.com/cybersecurity.

Podcast Transcript

Keri Stephens:

Hello and welcome to the 24/7 podcast on the MEDQOR Podcast Network. I’m Keri Stephens, the chief editor of 24×7. Today I’m joined by excellent guest, Scott Trevino, who serves as Senior Vice President of Cybersecurity at TRIMEDX. Cybersecurity is certainly the issue that keeps 24×7 readers and listeners up at night most, I’m really excited to have an expert like Scott to talk about what’s new in medical device cybersecurity. Scott, welcome.

Scott Trevino:

Thanks for having me. Glad to be here.

Keri Stephens:

We’re really glad to have you too. Can you talk about your role at TRIMEDX and what you do exactly?

Scott Trevino:

Sure. I’m the senior Vice President for cybersecurity, I do a few different things. One, I try and stay on top of cybersecurity trends, in particular focused on medical devices. And I also am responsible for building out our latest solution on cybersecurity that we offer to our current and future clients.

Keri Stephens:

Great. I really want to get into the bulk of the podcast because cybersecurity is such a big health issue in healthcare, especially medical devices. And what things are you seeing right now in terms of healthcare, cybersecurity? What trends are you seeing and how are health systems seeing an impact?

Scott Trevino:

Cybersecurity is critical for healthcare. Of the critical infrastructure in the US, what I would say is healthcare is by far the furthest behind the least mature, and it’s evidenced by a number of trends I’ll hit on. Number one, and I’ll throw a few numbers out there, there’s a ton, the increase in ransomware attacks in the last five years is up over 200% in healthcare. You juxtapose that with some of the other macro trends that are happening in healthcare where you have staffing shortages, increased costs across the board, 33% of hospitals are operating on negative margins, you have a 200% increase in attacks on top of it. It’s a challenging environment. And one other piece I’ll highlight is if you put it into real terms that you can grasp real easily, how many attacks happen per week on a health system generally? From 2021 to 2022, it went up 86%.

Scott Trevino:

That’s 750 plus attacks a week to over 1400 attacks a week. And there’s a number of reasons for that I would say. Attackers wouldn’t be increasing their attacks if it wasn’t fruitful, if there wasn’t a return on the invested risk. The benefits there, the likelihood of success is, and you may say, “Well, why is that?” And we can go into that in a bit more detail. But I’ll just hit on a couple of things. One, medical devices haven’t been designed maybe as rigorously with cybersecurity in mind, even though the technology’s evolved to be networked and there hasn’t been a lot of enforcement of good design practices around that from a regulatory standpoint to date.

Scott Trevino:

We can talk about some changes there. The other piece I would say is it takes a robust combination of the right people process and that technology, both the devices as well as cybersecurity technology. At a high level, those are a couple of the key data points. And maybe I’ll just leave with one final one there. I said healthcare is the most attacked critical infrastructure, from a cyber standpoint, it’s also got the highest cost per breach at over $10 million per breach. There’s a real dollar impact here that’s significant. And if you extrapolate that, we’re talking, the latest state I have is almost $8 billion of impact to healthcare. That’s going on high level.

Keri Stephens:

How are these disruptions impacting patient care, the clinicians caring for them and the biomeds serving the hospitals?

Scott Trevino:

That’s an excellent question. At the highest level, what I talk about a lot is delay of treatment is a harm. And that’s one of the biggest disruptions from just a practical standpoint, rescheduling delays in treatment or test results. In fact, recent survey shows that of those attacked about 70% reported delays in treatment and test results. And what’s really significant about that is that’s directly correlated with a 30 plus percent increase in direct patient harm or complications with the procedure.

Scott Trevino:

There is a real patient impact and of that same group, about 65% reported an increase in rerouting patients. Just imagine you’re in an area where you need a level one trauma, support, you’re in an ambulance route and that facility suffered a ransomware cyber attack and had to shut down its ER, where are you going to go? You may have to settle for a less than level one treatment center, or you may have to take an extra hour, 40 minutes, 30 minutes, 20 minutes, every minute counts when you need that kind of support. Those are the type of impacts that I think paint the right picture for what cyber can do for the patient. And just imagine even the simple ones, if the operating technology in a hospital’s disrupted, can you move patients between floors if the elevators aren’t working? I think those paint a real picture.

Keri Stephens:

In your role of TRIMEDX, how are you seeing hospitals respond to these trends and challenges?

Scott Trevino:

There’s an extreme amount of interest in cybersecurity for all the reasons I’ve mentioned. It’s real. When you’re getting an 86% increasing attacks on a weekly basis, people are feeling it. I would say folks are responding by assessing their current state, trying to understand what needs to be done based on where they are. And there’s a whole spectrum, as you would expect in a diverse industry and environment where you’ve got, from a continuum perspective, you may have those that are pretty rigorous with a robust cybersecurity program that covers the entire healthcare ecosystem, including medical devices to those that maybe are just beginning the journey. And it varies across the board. And what I like to say when talking to folks is to try and understand where they’re at, you meet them where they’re at because it’s a journey. It never stops. There’s no perfect security. It’s always an effort to move ahead and evolve. That’s what I like to share with folks, which is it’s not assessment of good or bad, where are you at and where can you get better and where should you get better.

Keri Stephens:

There’s obviously an interest in this topic at the federal level, what are you seeing and hearing in terms of legislation and what does this mean moving forward?

Scott Trevino:

Terrific. There’s a lot going on here. And I’ll paint a broad picture and then maybe get specific and maybe my teaser is this, there’s been recent legislation passed with the omnibus bill that really takes action on cybersecurity and empowers the FDA. But what I think is important to paint here is that in the recent years, going back to 2021 to today, there’s been four pieces of legislation passed recently. And prior to that, if we look at the timeframe from say 2000 through 2021, there’s only been less than only a few pieces of legislation about the same amount over a 10-11 year period. And in the last two years we see four significant pieces of legislation. There’s a true acceleration, I would say legislators, you probably see this on the news, you see this in the magazines or the articles you read that cybersecurity is top of mind and in particular in healthcare, you can’t shake a stick without seeing an article about cyber attacks or cybersecurity.

Scott Trevino:

The legislators are responding. And what I would say is the initial legislation over the past, from 2000 to 2021 or so have been really institutional, broad, cybersecurity legislation that puts in place the foundations for government working within government, basic requirements for reporting, allowing the creation of consensus standards, for instance, allowing for communication and requiring some basic standards within government and then how government works with private sector. Those are all good and important and required to grease the skids for work, but they’re not real tactical or what I’d like to say is practical. In the most recent couple of years, there’s been a few pieces of legislation that have done basically the same. I said there were four things passed in the last two years. There was the State and Local Government Cyber Act, which is again basically about the government, DHS, doing cyber assessments and providing assistance and some grants.

Scott Trevino:

There was CIRCIA, which is the Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act, which required reporting of attacks to CISA within 72 hours in ransomware payments reported within the last 24. And then strengthening the American Cybersecurity Act happened in 2022, which again is about critical infrastructure and mandates that not only do critical infrastructure after report to CISA, but civilian agencies as well. Those again, are all foundational things that don’t have a specific or immediate impact, direct impact on medical devices, although that as a critical infrastructure is involved.

Scott Trevino:

But this year, in 2023, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, that’s the fourth legislation that was passed among last two years or so, really put in some specifics around cybersecurity for medical devices. It empowered the FDA to act on these requirements. And these requirements at a high level require that OEMs ensure medical devices are secure as part of their pre-market approval process. When an OEM builds a new device, they submit it and have some requirements there. That paints sort of the landscape at a high level. And pause there, Keri, and see where we want to go next.

Keri Stephens:

I want to talk more about how the legislation’s impacting the healthcare provider. How exactly is it impacting the healthcare provider, the ISOs, the manufacturers? I know you get onto how it’s going to affect manufacturers with the new equipment and how much can health systems rely on legislations and regulations to guide their cybersecurity practices?

Scott Trevino:

That’s excellent. And if you could indulge me, I’ll give a little bit more detail on an overview of what the legislation is to highlight exactly what those impacts are to the healthcare providers. I mentioned FDA’s empowered to act, but what does that really mean? The FDA, when looking at these new submissions, we’ll look for requirements that show an SBOM for instance in the device, software bill of materials. Essentially it’s just like a bill of materials for when you receive something on your dock or at home. What’s in the box? And this is essentially the same thing, what is the composition of my device in terms of its software? What off the shelf software components? What open source code, what software of unknown provenance or soup is in there? That sort of stuff. That’s a requirement.

Scott Trevino:

A plan to address vulnerabilities in those devices to monitor, identify and respond is also another requirement. Those are pre-market requirements, part of the design of the device, but there’s also post-market requirements. The OEM needs to show how they’ll disclose vulnerabilities, they’re required to disclose and do it in a coordinated fashion and ensure devices are secure through updates and patches. Those are the pre and post market requirements that come in this, that FDA will enforce. There’s also some things where FDA is funded and required to provide new resources. The GAO, Government Accountability Office, is required to provide a report on the challenges in cyber across the board as well within the first year, and then an update to guidance on cyber. That paints the landscape to talk about the impacts.

Scott Trevino:

And I’ll take the second question first, which is can we rely on this legislation and providers should they rely on it? And I would say this is an awesome step forward in the right direction, but one of the challenges here is it’s focused entirely on new product authorizations and approvals. It’s a great start, but if we were to solely rely on this, it would take decades to turn over the install base with these requirements. And I say that based on experience where I’ve looked in some of my past looked at installed bases of devices for a broad spectrum of devices to say if we were to replace hypothetically the install base, how long would that take to turn over all the devices? And as we all know, medical devices have extended life spans, they’re usable for periods of time that are maybe greater than initially thought or even considered.

Scott Trevino:

We’re talking about decades before this would turn over if this law’s only applied to the pre-market. When we say can we rely on that, I would say it’s a great start, we should support it, but we should push for broader application. All of these things are great, but it seems ideal that once you set up an SBOM or a disclosure standard and requirement that you would apply it not only to the new devices, but to the predicate devices or predecessor devices because you’ve got a known way to go. And it would be fairly easy to do that. Nonetheless, I would say you can’t rely on it and you need to act. How this law though does impact, I would say the healthcare providers in particular, what I would say is, upfront, I highlighted a complex set of challenges that are out there.

Scott Trevino:

You got that going on in the background or as the context, I would say, you also have legacy devices. Your new devices when you purchase them, I think one thing to consider is what has been the history of your experience with whomever you’re purchasing these devices from in terms of cybersecurity and responsiveness, the disclosure of information patches? Are patches free? How responsive are they? Those are all things that should be considered that should get better, but you’re still dealing with legacy devices, existing vulnerabilities and the increasing threat landscape and cyber attack incidents. I think from a healthcare delivery organization standpoint, those are all things to consider. You can’t rely on the legislation to have an immediate impact, should support it. It’s a great thing. New purchases, certainly it should impact those things, but you really have to consider acting today and assessing what your current state is and address that while reaping some of the benefits that will trickle down from this legislation.

Keri Stephens:

You’ve been getting into this, but I really want to get into more best practices. I know our 24×7 listeners and readers are really, they want tangible best practices. Can you talk about some best practices or solutions and healthcare systems can take to feel more cyber secure?

Scott Trevino:

Sure, absolutely. I think I talk a lot about the real simple concept of people, process and technology. And one of the things that’s a challenge out there today, talking about the people perspective is a talent shortage. There’s a huge talent shortage for cyber professionals. I think it’s estimated at over just over 700,000 people in the US alone, over 3 million globally. You need talent, you need the right people, you need IT or cybersecurity professionals that’s traditionally at IT or InfoSec type of background. But you also need those folks that have biomed capability and understanding how to service and maintain medical devices. And we have a shortage there as well. When you look at getting somebody with both skills, I always say looking for a unicorn. And you got to deal with that. I think there’s some best practices there in terms of what I would say is work to provide training, support, certification, expand the biomed portfolio of tools in your biomed shops with broadened IT skillset and look to maybe there’s folks with traditional IT backgrounds that are interested in the biomed.

Scott Trevino:

There’s cross pollination opportunities. And what I find is upskilling and training your teams is a terrific way to go. It’s a great retention mechanism. People feel valued, you’re investing in them. It’s a rewarding experience. Certainly you need to recruit with those things in mind, I think. You need those right people. You also as a best practice should look at how do you integrate and cross pollinate those people across organizations between IT and the biomed teams so they work together well. And then the other pillar here on a process standpoint, you got to have the right people and then certainly the right process, I would say in a lot of cases, certainly there’s a spectrum of where different organizations land, but in a lot of cases there aren’t robust processes in place between those organizations, for medical device cybersecurity. For instance, are there documented processes or standard processes for how patching’s done?

Scott Trevino:

Who does it? When and how do you decide? How do you apply or determine what’s the appropriate compensating controls to apply them a medical device? Which gets outside of just the application of a validated patch. In many cases, one of the challenges here as a quick aside, is in our experience, more than 60% of devices do not have a validated patch that are vulnerable. And to throw another incredible number out there is the FBI estimates that 53% of active medical devices have a known critical vulnerability that’s not addressed. That’s just the critical vulnerability. You’ve got an incredibly challenging environment out there and not only do you have a challenge, you have a challenge getting patches, which means your devices are critically vulnerable, which necessitates the need for a compensating control and processes by which to create and implement those. And a compensating control is simply what it sounds like, it’s a mitigation, it’s not a remediation.

Scott Trevino:

It reduces the risk of that vulnerability by doing things like changing the configuration, segmenting, taking it off the network, that sort of thing. That’s an example of a process. There’s also processes to manage OEM relationships for the reasons I just mentioned. There’s an incredible threat landscape out there, a huge amount of vulnerabilities and vulnerable devices. You need to understand which devices are affected, how they’re affected and what the remediations are in working with the OEMs. Similarly, you need to have processes and people in place to monitor threats in the wild and sources of new intelligence around the new vulnerabilities and affected devices. And those things need to be integrated and documented. The other piece here too to consider is incident response, continuity of service. These are traditional procedures and are in place in almost every hospital. But what I’ve seen is, if you dig into the details of the question is to what extent do you have that for cyber incidents and how is biomed’s role and our clinical engineering team’s role identified in that and is that part of our HTM program?

Scott Trevino:

That’s the process piece. And then finally the technology, which is critical. It’s critical to really make most efficient the people doing the work and the processes that are employed. And one of the things I see oftentimes is investment in technology without investment in the other two becomes shelfware or very limited in benefit. That’s one key piece to consider. It’s not unique to cybersecurity or medical devices, but it’s really evident in medical device cybersecurity. And what I would say here from a technology standpoint, and it’s a landscape standpoint, is that there’s huge inventory inaccuracies or another way to say it, there’s huge opportunity to improve our inventory accuracy and technology can help with that through deploying a medical device security platform that passively perceives what devices are on the network, identifies them, profiles the behavior for anomalous behavior.

Scott Trevino:

And deploying that technology is a great best practice and integrating that with the people and processes you have really helps you improve your inventory accuracy and determine not only what you have but what’s impacted when something known vulnerability exists. Because one of the tricky parts about medical devices and vulnerability management is understanding which devices are truly impacted. And a traditional inventory, let’s say traditionally from a clinical engineering program standpoint, does not capture the attributes necessary to really get down to the level of detail and precision of what the device is and if it’s truly affected or not. Without that, you can create a lot of rework, not a true understanding of your risk profile. I think technology can help with that considerably. What I would say finally on the tech side is integration of like a security platform with CMMS, plugging into a SOC, security operations center, that may be monitoring, detecting threats and responding on a 24 by seven basis are all critical best practices.

Scott Trevino:

And at the highest level, I’d say the best practice is to assess where you are across those three pillars from a cyber standpoint, your healthcare technology management program, assess where you are and then identify your biggest risks and start to put a plan in place and execute on improving across those pillars. And there’s not a one size fits all because each group’s risk profile is typically unique. However, the approach I think can be standard, as I say, look at it in the ways I just mentioned, identify those issues and assess them. And you can use the NIST cybersecurity framework as a great place to do that if you want a reference point to take a standard, well accepted, best practice for medical devices, in my opinion, and approach to assess your current state. And it’s really about people processing tech.

Keri Stephens:

With all that we’ve discussed today, I hear that in addition to the advanced solutions you have available to your clinical engineering clients, TRIMEDX has worked to develop and release a similar cyber offering for hospitals without TRIMEDX as clinical engineering service solutions. Can you tell us about that right now?

Scott Trevino:

Yeah, absolutely. We’re very excited to be releasing a product called Vigor, which is exactly that. It’s a cybersecurity solution without the TRIMEDX CE program. We come in and are able to work with the existing biomed teams, really upskill and drive cybersecurity solutions for medical devices, but also help the collaboration and work with the IT team to really coordinate between those two groups, as we talked about before, to ensure a comprehensive cybersecurity solution for medical devices hitting on all points that I mentioned before. And what the solution does is come in and assess current state of your cyber program, risk prioritizes where we focus and work together to help drive improvement on that risk continuum to address your biggest threats, improve your inventory accuracy, and manage your vulnerabilities amongst other things, as well as improve your processes and capabilities.

Keri Stephens:

When will this be available to hospitals?

Scott Trevino:

It’s available today and you can find out more at trimedx.com/cybersecurity, where you can get in contact with us and we’ll provide more information and have a conversation, understand what your needs might be and how we might be able to help.

Keri Stephens:

Thank you so much, Scott. This has been so informative and I know our listeners will agree. And to our listeners, thank you for joining us today. As always, be sure to subscribe to the MEDQOR Podcast Network to keep up with the latest 24×7 podcast episodes and be sure to check out 24x7mag.com for the latest industry news. Until next time, take care.

 

Sponsored By: TRIMEDX

]]>
How ‘Ollie the Biomed’ Is Reaching HTM’s Next Generation  https://24x7mag.com/resource-center/podcasts/how-ollie-the-biomed-is-reaching-htms-next-generation/ Thu, 11 May 2023 22:28:13 +0000 https://24x7mag.com/?p=383412

In this episode of the 24×7 podcast on the MEDQOR Podcast Network, 24×7 chief editor Keri Forsythe-Stephens welcomes good friend of the podcast Chace Torres (aka: “The Bearded Biomed”) to discuss the launch of his new book, “Ollie the Biomed.” Torres shares that the book was inspired by the impending arrival of his firstborn son and his desire to create awareness and interest in the biomed field at an early age. He believes that building awareness among children is crucial and compares it to how kids learn about other professions through cartoons and books.

 Torres describes the process of writing and publishing the book, starting with multiple drafts and revisions of the script. He reveals how he collaborated with an artist via an online app to create the illustrations, ensuring they reflected his vision.

 The industry’s response to the book has been overwhelmingly positive, with biomeds and their children enjoying the story and illustrations. Torres’ goal is to extend the book’s reach beyond biomeds and into schools and libraries, and he has already donated copies to Children’s Health Hospital. He plans to explore various avenues, including school programs and awards, to further promote the book’s outreach.

 Overall, the podcast highlights Torres’ journey in writing and publishing “Ollie the Biomed” and emphasizes the importance of introducing children to the biomed field at an early age. Interested parties can buy the book here.

Podcast Transcript

Keri:

Hi. Welcome to the MEDQOR Podcast Network. This is Keri Stephens, the chief editor of 24×7. Thank you for joining me for this podcast episode. I’m so excited to have Wayne Moore with me today to delve into the right to repair. Wayne is a CEO of Acertara Acoustic Laboratories and the 2022 Chair of the Ultrasound section of MITA as well as a 2022 chair of the Service Committee for MITA. Wayne, thank you for joining me today.

Wayne:

Thank you, Keri. It’s good to be here.

Keri:

Yeah, no. We’re really happy to have you, and to start I want to talk about how you have a very unique perspective in regards to the right to repair, and can you talk about that a bit?

Wayne:

Sure. We’re kind of at the intersection of the right to repair issue in that we are a third party service repair company, Acertara is, so we’re unique in that respect that we’re a third party service repair company and we’re simultaneously chair of the Service Committee for MITA, which is primarily an OEM based advocacy group for medical imaging, and so we are also in the regulatory sphere in that the FDA is a customer of ours.

Wayne:

The OEMs are customers of ours, hospitals, third party service providers, so we get to see this whole issue kind of play out from multiple perspectives. Then we have our own perspective on it as well, so I think that certainly puts us in a very unique position and I get asked to give a lot of presentations on right to repair from various entities like regulatory as well as OEM as well as third party groups. We get to hear all the stories and participate in them, so I think that puts us into a really unique category with regard to that.

Keri:

Absolutely, so what do you think about it? What is your perspective?

Wayne:

I have the advantage of being old enough to have participated in the first right to repair activity that occurred back in the late 1990s, and that’s when I was starting in Sonora, and I think we started Sonora about the same time you guys started 24×7.

Keri:

1996.

Wayne:

Yeah, 1996. At that point there was a lot of discussion about remanufacturing and third party service providers being regulated by the FDA, and it caused a lot of commotion like it has this time as well. Finally the FDA basically just said they were going to punt that and not do anything about it at that particular time. Well, they punted it and it was the longest punt I’ve ever seen because it didn’t resurrect again until six years ago, 6 1/2 years ago, so that 15-yard punt, or 15-year punt. That’s pretty good.

Wayne:

I came into it understanding the historical background, what the issues were at that particular time, and here we are 6 1/2 years later since the second round of the right to repair issue and third party service issue with the FDA commenced and we’re still no farther down the line than we were 6 1/2 years ago. The FDA still hasn’t come out with its remanufacturing guidance, et cetera, and there’s been a lot of misinformation, a lot of misunderstandings that have been going around that have colored this into kind of a zero sum game, and we don’t see it like that. As a third party service provider, we see ourselves partnering with OEMs, partnering with hospitals, partnering with regulatory groups.

Wayne:

There is a way to do it. There is a right way to do it, and so we don’t look at it like that. We don’t get into the name calling exercises that unfortunately taint this whole discussion and kind of put it as a Hatfields and McCoy feud rather than hey, let’s work together to see what we can do to make this thing actually benefit hospitals, benefit biomedical engineers, third party companies, remanufacturers, and the manufacturers. That’s where we stand and that’s why I have been such an advocate in trying to bring all of these things together, and some success and some not so successful.

Keri:

Yeah. I know for us especially, whenever we talk about the right to repair it is such a contentious issue and I don’t think anything gets people as mad. Anytime we have an article on right to repair there’s always such different sides and that’s why I wanted you on the podcast because you bring such a unique perspective to this because yes, you are working with MITA, and you are a third party provider, service provider, so it’s these two different views, but I mean, you talk about working together for the good of the patient, coming together. How can we come together on this, because it is so contentious?

Wayne:

Well, that’s a great question. I think the first thing is is for everybody just to sit down, take a deep breath and say look. We’re all working for the same thing. This is about lowering the costs that hospitals pay, overall costs, not just a transactional cost. I mean, anybody can go in and do a service call for 50 bucks less than the next guy, but is that a long-term successful strategy that’s going to help the financial issues that hospitals face right now? It’s not clear to me. I’m not convinced of that, that that can happen. It takes what’s the life cycle cost of repairing that system, and I just can only speak to medical imaging devices, the real high-tech devices like MR and CT, NukMed and ultrasound, of course, which I’m primarily vested in.

Wayne:

But there’s a lot more that goes into calculating what the cost of ownership is over the life cycle of the product than just a one-off repair thing that might happen, a break/fix kind of an issue. I think it’s the realization of let’s really talk about how we can save hospitals money, how we can alleviate some of the apprehension of having unregulated repair providers going into hospitals and performing repairs that may or may not be in the best interests of the patient in the hospital, and also the regulatory issues.

Wayne:

Until we can get to that, so the one side that I’m on, the third party side, unfortunately too often says that the OEMs are only in it for the money, which that’s of course absurd. It’s just not accurate and it causes consternation for sure. Then they say the OEMs are against third parties. Well, that’s kind of odd because I’m a third party and I’m the chair of the service section for MITA, so if they were against us I’m not sure why they’d put me in as chair of that. They’re interested in the same things everybody else is.

Keri:

Does that ever feel weird, though, to be working with MITA and then have such a differing perspective from most of the industry? That must be interesting. I want to hear about that.

Wayne:

Well, it is interesting, especially when I see some of the conversations going on back and forth. Some people may say well, the OEMs are in some dark, smoke-filled room cutting deals with Congress and stuff like that. Well, I’m in on every meeting and I’m yet to be in that dark and smoke-filled room where all the real deals are getting cut and stuff like that. Everybody’s working really hard. OEMs have congresspeople that they work with. Third parties have congresspeople they work with, and so we’ve got to calm down, I think, on the rhetoric first and the blaming and stuff like that because I see the OEMs operate, on a weekly basis we have a meeting for MITA and the service committee, and they have the utmost respect for service providers who are 13485 certified and doing the right thing, and have that good history.

Wayne:

They use them, right? But the OEMs go through, in the absence of any FDA guidance, when the OEMs contract with a third party service organization like us, they come in and they go through our quality management system with a fine tooth comb before they will allow us to do any of the work for them, because after all, at the end of the day it’s their name that’s still on the machine or still on the ultrasound probe, and they want to make sure that their brand isn’t injured as well. OEMs have never said that they’re against third party service. I defy anyone to show me that sentence.

Wayne:

What they’ve consistently said and what I’ve consistently been part of was they are against unregulated third party service. I am too. I’m against that. I think that it’s in the best interest of the patient that companies have full transparency with their quality management system and they adhere to it, and so that’s kind of the perspective I bring from them. I see the other side too from third parties. Sometimes it can be very difficult to work with an individual OEM, for sure. Not all OEMs are willing and ready and able to just turn over all of their service stuff at basically cost to third party service providers without any kind of accountability. That’s just not going to work.

Wayne:

There’s still got to be a lot of give and take between the two entities, and then I put on my regulatory hat and I see the FDA just basically throwing up their hands and saying they’re going to be damned if they do and damned if they don’t, no matter which way they go. They’re going to be yelled at by somebody, right? It’s that kind of a situation that we find ourselves in. It’s going to be very difficult to get out of that situation, and I think it’s going to take something like an act of Congress or enforcement by the FDA to really break the stalemate. That’s my opinion where we’re at right now.

Wayne:

I think it will not be handled with handshakes. They tried with the collaborative community and that didn’t work for a lot of reasons. If you ask the third parties it was the OEMs’ fault. If you ask the OEMs it’s the third parties’ fault. If you ask the FDA they go we don’t assign blame, but we still have to get back to that kind of a situation where the organizations can come together and say okay, here’s the way it’s going to be, and everybody agrees on it. Of course the other thing that got thrown into the mix at the very beginning is somehow, and I’m not sure exactly when it happened, the HTMs started thinking that somehow the third party service applied to them, which it doesn’t.

Wayne:

An HTM, who works directly for the hospital, as everyone knows in contract law, there’s two parties to a contract, party of the first part and party of the second part. We’ve heard that on TV for 50 years, right? If you’re an employee, full-time employee of the hospital, you’re already party to the contract that exists between the OEM and the hospital, so they’re not third party servicers and the HTM, if the hospital tells their employee we want you to try and fix this, they can do it. There’s no law against them doing that. The issues come if they break it or if there’s a patient event. Then that invites the scrutiny, obviously, of the FDA inside the hospital, but as long as they’re repairing their own equipment and not returning it back into interstate commerce, then they are acting as the second part of that contract. But the HTMs have been very instrumental in certainly the last few years in being advocating for third party service repair.

Keri:

Yeah, and one thing I continually hear, just on the flip side, to be devil’s advocate, a lot of our readers have said this is the OEMs trying to get money. This is not about safety. This is about money. What is your reaction to that?

Wayne:

Well, like I said, everybody has to make a profit. Show me a third party service company that’s not charging for doing their service. Everybody charges for doing their service and I can’t speak, nor would I even attempt to speak for all the OEMs, but I can tell you from a MITA perspective, which is only the imaging devices, so infusion pumps or patient monitors I have no understanding of how OEMs treat everybody regarding those devices. But from the OEM perspective, these people have family. They have family that gets treated for medical conditions. They go to oncology and they get MRIs and they get ultrasounds, et cetera like that. They’re not in it to bankrupt the hospital.

Wayne:

Their strong motivation, certainly from an engineering perspective, and I’m an engineer, used to work for Siemens, and from the engineering perspective it’s about creating new and wonderful technologies that can be used to detect disease earlier. That’s what motivates a lot of the OEM personnel, for sure, the employees, to get out of bed every morning thinking they may be part of developing the next system that will diagnose cancer at the cellular level and allow treatment. That’s what gets people going. They’re not checking their stock portfolios every morning to see if they can carve another two pennies out of a product. Yeah, they make a profit off of service just like third parties do.

Keri:

Earlier in this you mentioned the FDA collaborative communities, which we wrote about several years ago, I guess maybe two years ago, and that was the thing. Help solve the contention between the right to repair and just make everyone happier, maybe Kumbaya, I don’t know, but that was definitely the vibe it was giving off in the beginning, and why do you think it didn’t work?

Wayne:

That’s a great question. Again, this is my own opinion, but the reason I think it didn’t work was the FDA did not take a leadership position in the collaborative community. I mean, it’s like tying two cats’ tails together and throwing them over a clothesline, right? There’s going to be a lot of fighting going on, more fighting than Kumbaya moments. With the FDA not taking a leadership position, in my view it was doomed from the beginning, okay? Because any time, if you read anything at Harvard Business Review, anywhere, about collaborative communities, without strong leadership they’re always doomed. Companies fight each other. That’s the way it goes, and without somebody in there in a strong leadership position, driving toward an end result, had no shot.

Wayne:

The OEMs are very process driven, at least I can say for the OEMs I am familiar, very process driven. They take a long time to make decisions. When they do make a decision, they stick with it for a long time as well. Third parties, I’m an entrepreneur, we like to make decisions in a few minutes, and that’s how sometimes we run our business and create new business, is by making decisions in a very fast manner. When you have people that want to get something done right away and others that are being guided by the upper management within an organization to take a slow, methodical, let’s get it right process together, it makes one company, or one entity, look like they’re dragging their feet and the other one like they’re way too quick to pull the trigger on something.

Wayne:

Again, without that central leadership position from the FDA, that’s what we found ourselves in. The third parties said the OEMs can’t get past the processes and the OEMs were saying decisions can’t be made that quickly because they’re the producers. They got to go back and implement all this within a massive organization and get it socialized within the organization, get it integrated within all the processes and procedures. It’s not limited just to the United States, but it has to go throughout the world, certainly with the imaging devices. The same kind of issues with CE labeling and other regulatory issues that occur in different countries.

Wayne:

The local service organization like me, I might worry about a particular market segment just in the United States, but Siemens operates in 161 different countries around the world with a lot of different regulations and everything. To take what we do here and to just integrate it into that doesn’t work. It takes a lot longer for OEMs to make those kind of decisions and see how they’re going to integrate it into their aggregate business. I think it may not be possible, but if you could limit it to North America or just the United States, I think it would be a lot easier, but that’s really not how it works within large OEMs.

Keri:

For a final question, what else do you want to tell 24×7 listeners about the right to repair, and just your unique perspective or any misconceptions from the MITA perspective that you want to clear up?

Wayne:

I think what happens is, at least, again, from my perspective, it still gets back to the rhetoric and these seminars that are held at various regional and national meetings for biomedical engineers and only having one perspective talked about up on the stage or the presenter or if there is a couple of presenters, and not hearing about some of the issues that the OEMs have to face as well and get that put out there.

Wayne:

Some of them, unfortunately, some of these meetings that I have attended have been “let’s bash the OEM,” and I think that’s what stirs up even more kind of resentment and alienation between the two groups. If we can get that toned down and maybe have equal representation on some of these talks so that people can hear both sides of the equation. It’s famous in the legal profession, you know, that there are three sides to every story: your side, my side, and the truth. If you’re only getting one side of the story then you’re missing out on the other two-thirds of it. That’s what I would like to see happen, and I think it would go a long way to bringing the groups back together again.

Keri:

That is a great statement. Well, thank you so much, Wayne. We really appreciate what you’ve shared with us today, and we hope it’s really informative for our listeners. To check out the latest of 24×7, please visit 24x7mag.com. Until next time, take care. Thank you.

Wayne:

Take care.

 

]]>
Secrets from 24×7’s Salary Survey https://24x7mag.com/resource-center/podcasts/secrets-from-24x7s-salary-survey/ https://24x7mag.com/resource-center/podcasts/secrets-from-24x7s-salary-survey/#comments Thu, 23 Mar 2023 17:50:29 +0000 https://24x7mag.com/?p=383028

In this podcast, 24×7’s chief editor Keri Stephens sits down with Chace Torres, aka “The Bearded Biomed,” to discuss the results of 24×7’s 2022 compensation and job satisfaction survey. Notably, the survey saw an increase in engagement, with female respondents doubling from the previous year.

Stephens and Torres discuss the factors that may have contributed to this increase, including outreach from educational parties and social media engagement from industry professionals. The pair also highlight the value of continuing education, which 35% of survey respondents said they were pursuing, and how it is vital for healthcare technology management professionals to grow in their career field.

Another key theme from 24×7’s 2022 compensation and job satisfaction survey was the number of respondents who said they would promote the HTM profession to others, with 36% very likely to do so and 29% likely, despite a prevalent theme of feeling overworked. Stephens and Torres also delve into the problem of an aging workforce and the need to replace those retiring from the HTM industry. Overall, the survey results indicate positive trends in the HTM industry, with an increase in engagement, diversity, and education.

Finally, Stephens and Torres get into the weeds of the salary survey and discuss some of the most surprising findings from it.

Podcast Transcript
Keri Stephens:

Hello, this is the 24×7 podcast on the MEDQOR Podcast Network. I’m Keri Stephens and I’m the chief editor of 24×7 and your host. Today I’m here with a good friend of the podcast, Chace Torres, AKA, the Bearded Biomed. And we are here to discuss the results of the 2022 HTM Salary Survey, which came out earlier this year. Chace, thanks for joining me today.

Chace Torres:

Absolutely. I’ve been looking forward to it. This is 2023, we’re here, ready to link up on the mics again.

Keri Stephens:

We are. So just for everyone to know, I was on Chace’s Spirited Biomed podcast to discuss this survey, so be sure to check that out too. This is a part two, we just really wanted to get into the weeds of the survey and I have to say there was a lot of things that surprised me about this year survey, but Chace what surprised you most from a actual biomed perspective?

Chace Torres:

Specifically, which we talked another time on this, but the main thing for me was for one, the engagement of the survey. So, more respondents and of those respondents, more than being female, which is fantastic. Your numbers of respondents of females, which I think almost doubled compared to the year prior.

Keri Stephens:

They did. So, in 2021, females represented 11% of the survey respondents and in 2022, it doubled to 22%, 22%. So, for the biomed field, that’s pretty noteworthy, especially when there’s been such a stigma of women in the field, how it’s a male-dominated field, which okay, it still is, but that seems to be changing, which is really noteworthy to me.

Chace Torres:

Yes, it is still male dominated, but the fact that you do have, like I said, a doubling of a percentage of people engaging, which unless they just happen to find out about it for the first time ever, it’s very likely that we had growth within the field. So, it’s very encouraging.

Keri Stephens:

So, what do you think’s contributing to that, why do you think more women are joining the HGM field?

Chace Torres:

I think it’s a combination of different factors. There’s been a lot of outreach from educational parties, organizational, such as AMI, College of Biomed, then you have the social media engagement from individuals like myself, Bryant, Sherell, Justin, believe it or not, just yesterday I noticed another young lady biomed started her own YouTube channel.

Keri Stephens:

Nice.

Chace Torres:

Alaskan Traveling Biomed. Which I’m all for. The more engagement, the more we can get people to see what we do, absolutely. So, go check out her YouTube channel as well if y’all are listening. It’s pretty cool, a lot of snow ASMR, which I appreciate.

But getting back to what I was speaking of, is there’s a lot of different factors of people going through and explaining exactly what we do. And for many years, speaking to a lot of my female colleagues, just from them going to where it was, to what it is now, there’s more engagement and more understanding that obviously females can do the same job than a man can do.

Keri Stephens:

Absolutely.

Chace Torres:

And with this being essentially a STEM career, it’s mathematics, it’s science, it’s electronics, it’s a combination of everything. I think that people are finally starting to get the value of it and wanting to pursue about it and obviously, the word’s grown about it. So, I think that’s at least a factor in it, if not a big chunk of the pie.

Keri Stephens:

I agree. And I will say another thing that surprised me personally that we did discuss in your podcast was the amount of readers or survey respondents that’s readers pursuing further education. So this year, or in 2022, 35% said they are currently pursuing further education, which was a noteworthy jump from 2021. And I think it does speak to more people joining the field, a changing demographic and maybe one that is really more interested in seeing how education can further their career, which I think is amazing.

Chace Torres:

Continuing education is something that is absolutely vital for any biomed who wants to grow in their career field to take on. And obviously, with more credentialing, more education, certifications, when you add that to your repertoire or your tool belt as some might say, it’s going to yield you further opportunities for maybe a position that you’re looking to get promoted to, or it’s going to make you more sought after in the recruiting market, for you to go find that job and get that raise that you want to. Education, obviously it makes us better technicians, but it also is going to yield back to you greater opportunity, greater pay.

Keri Stephens:

Absolutely. And personally, another thing that I thought was cool that we can talk about, was the amount of people that said they would promote the HTM profession to others. So, even if they do feel overworked, which was a theme we heard throughout the survey, they really still are … 36% said they were very likely to promote the HTM profession and 29% said they were likely. So, these are good numbers. I mean, these people are really recommending people to come and be part of this, which we need.

I mean, there’s definitely a problem with the aging out of the biomeds, if we don’t know who’s going to replace these people that are retiring. I think the field was a little younger than in previous years, but I mean typically, the average biomed is over 40. So, we need these new people coming into the field. So, that was really good for me to hear.

And one of my favorite quotes that people … that one of the respondents wrote said, “I feel like the motor in the vehicle, you may not always see me, but you know that I’m making it possible to provide adequate care for all patients.” Can you talk about that from an actual biomed perspective, why you feel like the motor in the vehicle or if you do?

Chace Torres:

You know me, I love any kind of anecdote or suggestion of what a biomed is within everything else. We’ve been called so many things. Motor is very suitable because we keep everything running. I mean, we literally do, we keep all of your medical devices and all of your facilities operational according to manufacturer specifications.

So, in order to do that, I mean it requires a lot. There’s so many different modalities out there. There’s so many different types of trainings, different requirements that these machines will exact on a technician to be aware of. Sometimes it’s as simple as getting left seat, right seat training from a senior technician that’s experienced in it. And some of them, when you get into specialty modalities, you’re having to go after that specialized OEM training.

So, what am I alluding to with this? Is we literally have so many different components that we have to take care of that we are essentially a motor within the medical facility. We’re keeping everything up and running. We’re engaging with them on a daily basis. Whether you’re in-house or a field service technician, bouncing into different facilities, you are supplying them with the ability for them to do what they need to do, which is patient care.

So, without the medical equipment, then that’s not going to happen. Or at least it’s … the level of patient care will be minimized. I’m not going to say that nurses and doctors can’t do their job without equipment, but it’ll make their jobs harder, right?

Keri Stephens:

Much harder. Yeah, for sure. Well I think too, now we probably need to get into the bulk of what people care about with the salary survey. I mean, the keyword’s salary. People want to know if they’re being paid adequately. And this year, I will say the results were a bit mixed. Certain regions performed better. The mountain west seemed to do really well. They outpaced most of the other regions in the survey and the BMET IIs in the Mountain West region had a lot of growth. So, their salaries, their median salaries grew from 60,500 to 75,100 year over year. And actually what I thought was crazy, the Mountain West based BMET Is saw their salaries grow from 47,500 to 67,200 year over year. And these are pretty good numbers, but again, all regions were not created equally. And that’s something we’ve seen in every salary survey every year, that certain regions do well. Why do you think the Mountain West saw so much higher growth in other regions? If you have any ideas?

Chace Torres:

I mean honestly, it could just be a factor of trying to catch up with the rest of the country because each and every year we see … We’ll have one region that just outperforms the rest of them in terms of HTM pay and then the others either remain stagnant or it’s so minuscule of a drive up in what you’re raising pay for these technicians that it’s not notable. So, you have that factor and I want to say the mountain region has been due okay for that increase in time. Secondly is-

Keri Stephens:

The Southern had the biggest boom in 2021.

Chace Torres:

Right, and then if you consider cost of living, that is why there’s such a disparity between all the regions. We are not all the same in what it costs to live, cost of living in California is going to be dramatically different like for instance, where I am in Texas. Hence why most people move here from California, just because you get more bank for your buck and with the mountain region and a lot of the states up there, the economy’s starting to boom for them. There’s more opportunities out there. Like I said, they’re trying to catch up to the rest of the states. And then let’s not forget we have inflation going on right now.

Keri Stephens:

Absolutely.

Chace Torres:

So, it’s very likely that a lot of these are trying to meet the curve and stay either ahead of adjust adjustment for inflation or they’re just trying to tiptoe the line, to at least be adequate and competitive pay-wise.

Keri Stephens:

Because they say inflation’s about 7%, it could be higher now. And I thought another interesting thing, and we see this every year, but some years it’s more marked than others. But the clinical engineers, out of all the job titles did the best in 2022 in regards to salary growth. So, they saw their median salaries grow 14,300 year over year to 103,500. And that’s across the board nationwide. So, they did well and the managers … okay, so nationwide, the managers, those with the manager job title, they finally broke the six figure ceiling and they saw their salaries rise to 110,500, which is a $10,700 year over year raise.

I mean, again, it’s certain job titles too, [inaudible 00:11:22]. Which we always see. But I thought that was interesting because we haven’t seen the clinical engineers see that kind of growth lately in the past few years I’ve been doing this.

Chace Torres:

Well, they’ve also had the fancier title than the rest of us. So, they they’ve gotten benefited in other ways. No, it’s good for the field in general, no matter what region you’re in, what position you’re in. When we see growth and salary range for the biomed, it’s moving us more towards what I feel our pay range needs to be at. Because while we are not considered tradesmen, we are a tradesman craft. We deal with HVAC from time to time, we deal with plumbing, we deal with refrigeration, we deal with electrician. We’re also navigating with the IT network as well.

Keri Stephens:

Right, with cyber, yeah.

Chace Torres:

So, while we are not inherently in all of those jobs, we’re constantly working aside those individual, whether it’s for insulation, tear down, standard preventive maintenance, repair, whatever. A lot of these, depending on the type of medical device you’re working on, it’s going to have some factor of that as well. So, when you consider, like let’s say what an electrician or a plumber makes on a year to year basis in different regions, we’re slowly starting to catch up to this is a craft, this is a profession that has the same level of schooling, if not more. And then also has the requirements to be certified, be engaged in continuing your education and be the master of your universe to be able to support these medical facilities. So, it makes me happy.

Keri Stephens:

Do you think overall, education is the way to get higher salaries in this industry?

Chace Torres:

It’s a half and half way because there are facilities out there that they won’t hire you without a CBET. There are companies out there that will not give you a promotion without a certain degree, level, or a certain certification. I know my company has a career ladder to where if you want to move into that regional area, you got to have your CHTM, your CBET, a bachelor’s in biomedical engineering, management, what have you.

So, education is inherently injected into moving up within our career field. However, that’s not always going to be the case for you to get a higher pay rate. Experience always is going to be vital when you have somebody that’s been doing it for so longer is literally a subject matter expert in one particular modality, whether they’re gone through all these different schools or not, but they’ve just been doing it so long, then they’re more inherently going to have the opportunity to get higher pay. But those are outliers nowadays because a lot of those individuals are probably on the verge of retiring or going to be retiring. So, more often than not, I think your greatest solution to a pay raise is probably going after either schooling, getting your degree, or obviously getting a certification from the ACI.

Keri Stephens:

Well, one thing I noticed this year too in the survey, and I’m not sure how much this goes into the actual salaries people receive, but the environment of care changed a lot with our readers. We saw a lot more ISOs represented in the 2022 salary survey than in previous years. So, ISOs represented 21% of the survey respondents rather, and hospitals, medical centers, multi-hospital systems only represented 69%, which 69% is obviously a major majority, but in previous years that was much higher. So, I wonder how much the ISO’s takeover is going to contribute to salaries.

Chace Torres:

Well, I’ve been ISO my entire career, for those of you that don’t know what that means, Independent Service Organization, we are literally the link between medical facilities, whether you have an in-house program or not, I’ve worked alongside them too, and the OEM. So, what that typically means is not only do we need to meet and exceed your expectations as a end user or owner of your medical device, but we also have to help bridge the gap to the manufacturer.

Sometimes, at least over the last year, there was multiple times that we were contacted by OEMs to facilitate repairs or services because they cannot get out to that region or didn’t have a presence within that region. Let’s be frank, OEMs are also struggling with staffing as well.

So, the ISO technician has the opportunity to wear more hats and contribute and make more of an impact across the grand landscape of their region than, let’s say an in-house programmer. I say this sometimes and it does make people’s heads turn, but … now this is the but, a well-managed ISO team can outperform any in-house program.

Now when I say that, people are like, “Wait, what is this guy talking about?” We have to not only be to the level of every other technician out there, but we also have to exceed reporting or be on par. Typically, we’re exceeding manufacturer reporting because we’re going out there and getting ISO certified 9001, 13485 depending on your company.

So, there’s a lot more embedded with ISO technicians that are requiring you to, let’s be honest, get a little bit of a higher pay because you’re having to do more. You’re managing your own time, you’re scheduling multiple clients, not just handling one facility. You’re going out there getting certified, you’re doing excessive documentation because that’s what we are in this industry now.

So, do I think that they’re taking over? No, but there’s also been a … I mean, I’ve always heard for the past decade, maybe since I’ve been in the field that for a long time, ISO companies were not really thought well of because you could have an outlier, like a mom and pop shop, a one or two technicians band together, do really terrible work and like I said, they’re outlier and then that stains the reputation of the regular … all the other companies out there doing third party services. But as with COVID and the staffing issues and the educational parameters and regulatory parameters, it’s becoming more and more understood that independent service organizations are bringing something to the table. So with that, more respondents, higher pay, and that’s, I think is at least the foundational of where all this started.

Keri Stephens:

No, that’s a really good perspective. So, you’re talking about the OEMs, and I want to get into one of the things that kept being pointed out in the survey, and it was supply chain issues. I mean, obviously personnel, supply chain issues, that’s been well documented in the HTM field and people in the survey talked about it too, how their departments are smaller, they’re being tasked with more work. They’ve gone from nine technicians to four.

But another thing that people mentioned a lot was the actual supply chain issues, getting equipment and how parts especially has been hard to get and they’ve been basically stranded in ports and all of that. So, has that something that you’ve noticed personally and have you seen it get better since the beginning of COVID is it improving or is this just something that we’re living with?

Chace Torres:

It has gotten better. There are still some outliers of lead time, of … I mean, there’s still parts out there for specific companies, for specific modalities that sometimes a lot of these companies, they’ve outsourced their manufacturing process of certain parts outside of the country because it costs less, cost of labor, cost of manufacturing is just cheaper.

The other impact to that is, like we saw last year there, was significant lead time because there was no supply at all. We had canals getting blocked. We just had a lot of craziness happen around quarter four. And a lot of people don’t realize too, around the quarter four sector of the year, a lot of manufacturers aren’t resupplying their stock to begin with. They’re trying to basically use what they got. So, there’s already intrinsically built in, that there’s going to be less of what you need available. I think the major thing that everybody was feeling was something so simple was the AED. Could not get ahold of pads, could not get a hold of batteries.

I had facilities that were holding on, that we just happened to come out and they had well past due date pads for their AEDs, but they’re like, “I’ve had some on order for six, eight months and there’s no ETA of when I’m going to get them. So, I’d rather have something than nothing.”

I think we’ve gone past that. I think we’re looking towards a smoother horizon compared to the scare of middle and late of last year. But supply chain’s always going to be an issue. It’s just a matter of how you navigate your supply chain. So, some facilities out there have one supplier, one vendor that they’re going to order through because it’s approved in their system and that’s all they’re going to use.

Others, which I think is smarter, has multiple vendors that they could pull from. “Okay, if this doesn’t have it, but I need it, I can go here, here, here, here.” It’s just a matter of honestly, how you manage your system, which will help you navigate those shortfalls that we’re going to … this will happen again. It’s not like that was an outlier. It will happen again. It’s better, but like I said, if you can set yourself up for your success, to be able to go after different vendors to get that supply, you’re going to be in a better place.

Keri Stephens:

So, for my last question, I want to hear from you why people should take the salary survey, because I tell people all the time, but I will say before you answer that, that we continually get emails just thanking us for disseminating this information and helping people get raises and just making sure that the industry is paid fairly, but you were actually in the industry and I’d love to hear it from you and your key takeaway about the importance of the survey.

Chace Torres:

Well, it’s important for engagement, transparency, interaction, of establishing what people should be getting paid. And I mean, if you consider just from the recruiting standpoint, you have other companies out there that you can google HTM salary and you can look up at all these different companies and they all say different things.

And here’s the trick people, is a lot of people still don’t know what our job is, what it entails. You’ll have recruiters reach out to you for a job that’s completely different than what you’re doing. So, if they have no idea what your job description is, how do you think that they’re measuring it out in the interwebs, your pay compared with all these jobs they’re trying to compare you to? It’s not going to be as accurate.

What the HTM Salary Survey does is it pulls all the respondents that everybody interacts with it, and this is actual biomeds telling you what they get paid, what their transgressions are, what their likes are, what is the heartbeat of our career, you can’t take that for granted. That’s why it’s so critical that we all respond to this survey because it gives us a snapshot of the previous year of where we stand, that I don’t think any other company out there that’s measuring other professions is going to be able to do accurately.

Now, there’s always going to be somebody that says, “Well, how do you know that a biomed’s saying that what they’re paid is accurate? Maybe they’re adding an extra 20,000, 30,000, 40,000 to their pay?” Well, if you’re actually doing that, then why are you even taking it?

I understand there’s the argument that everybody’s putting in fake salaries, so that way they can beef up our pay ranges and everything so we can obviously get higher pay. I think that’s probably, if that is occurring, it’s outliers and guess what? 24×7 is doing due diligence. They bring in a company to help sort through all of this and actually compile the data and do it on a pretty miraculous scale.

So, this is something that every biomed I know looks forward to every single year because it gives you accurate data that you can take home to the bank, literally take to your manager, say, “Hey, this is what our pay range in this region is. I’m nowhere near that. What are you going to do?” Or if they still have to argue about that, you could say, “Okay, I’m here. This is where the pay is here. What do you need from me so you can give me a raise or give me the promotion that I’ve been wanting?” So at the very least, it’s going to spark the conversation between you and your management team to what’s required of you to get to that next level. And if they don’t want to help you with that, then you know, need to look at another position.

Keri Stephens:

Absolutely. And there’s always positions available, so we do know that.

Chace Torres:

Exactly. Especially in our field.

Keri Stephens:

Absolutely. Well, thank you so much. That was really helpful. Can you tell everyone where they can find you?

Chace Torres:

Well, if you just so happen to google anything, just google Bearded Biomed and it will drop you into every single social media that I have. Facebook, TikTok, Instagram, LinkedIn, what have you. But if you want to catch the channel, Bearded Biomed is on YouTube, video podcasts, or if you’d like to listen, Spotify, Apple Podcast, wherever you take in your podcast, however you may listen, that’s where you’ll find me.

Keri Stephens:

And I encourage everyone to listen to part one of our conversation on Chace’s Bearded Biomed podcast. Thank you. And to our audience, thank you for listening.

Be sure to subscribe to the MEDQOR Podcast network to keep up with the latest episodes of the 24×7 podcast. And in the meantime, check out 247xmag.com to keep up with the latest industry news. Until next time, take care.

Chace Torres:

Toodles.

]]>
https://24x7mag.com/resource-center/podcasts/secrets-from-24x7s-salary-survey/feed/ 1